Massive Transfusion/Hemorrhage Protocols Versus Goal-Directed Bleeding Management: Science Gone Eerie?

Abstract

Key questions in bleeding management are “Why does my patient bleed?” and “How to fix it?” To answer the first question, the high negative predictive value of viscoelastic testing can be used to identify coagulopathic bleeding. Accordingly, goal-directed bleeding management (GDBM) guided by viscoelastic testing has been shown to be an effective and essential part of the second pillar of patient blood management (PBM) with the aim to improve patients’ outcomes and safety. Patient’s medical and drug history – with a focus on medication with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs – are important in emergency, urgent, and elective surgery. Furthermore, risk scores have been developed and validated for traumatic and obstetric hemorrhage and can be helpful tools to predict severe hemorrhage and the need for massive transfusion. Acidosis, hypocalcemia, anemia, and hypothermia (“diamond of death in trauma”) are important basic conditions for hemostasis and good predictors of coagulopathy and should be closely monitored by blood gas analysis and corrected in bleeding patients. Earlier time to hemostasis was associated with decreased mortality in trauma studies. Therefore, GDBM aims to stop the bleeding as soon as possible and avoid the main killers in blood transfusion: Transfusion-associated circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion-related immune modulation, and thrombosis. Thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management follows the concepts of Good Medical Practice and Precision Medicine. Here, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-guided bleeding management algorithms are using a stepwise approach based on the sequence “Treat first what kills first:” (1) Fibrinolysis management, (2) clot firmness management, (3) thrombin generation management, and (4) avoidance of hypercoagulability and thrombosis. Here, thromboelastometry can not only identify patients with hypercoagulability and increased risk of thrombosis but also ROTEM-guided bleeding management can avoid thromboembolic complications, too. This may support the idea of personalized antithrombotic therapy guided by viscoelastic testing in the postoperative period. Finally, PBM is not about blood transfusion: It is about patients’ outcomes. Accordingly, several meta-analyses based on more than 20 randomized controlled trials on the effect of viscoelastic testing-guided perioperative bleeding management did not only demonstrate a significant reduction in transfusion requirements but also a significant reduction in mortality and postoperative acute kidney injury. The reduction in postoperative acute kidney injury again has a significant impact on long-term survival. Accordingly, recent PBM guidelines recommend the implementation of viscoelastic testing-guided bleeding management algorithms with a 1B or 1A recommendation. This is also addressed in the World Health Organization policy brief about the urgent need to implement PBM in all member states in a timely manner. However, even if the number of national activities is increasing, there is still a long way to go.