“…Sytematic reviews can be classified in different categories (Paul & Criado, 2020), such as: a structured review when focusing on widely used methods, theories and constructs (Canabal & White, 2008; Kahiya, 2018; Paul & Singh, 2017; Rosado‐Serrano et al., 2018); framework‐based when frameworks like ADO (Antecedents, Decisions, and Outcome) employed by Paul and Benito (2018), or TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology) developed by Paul and Rosado‐Serrano (2019) are used; a hybrid‐narrative review when a framework is integrated in a narrative discussion leading to a future research agenda (Bahoo et al., 2020; Dabić et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2020; Paul et al., 2017); a theory‐based review (Gilal et al., 2019; Paul & Rosado‐Serrano, 2019); a meta‐analysis (Barari et al., 2021; Knoll & Matthes, 2017; Rana & Paul, 2020); a bibliometric review (Kumar et al., 2019, 2020; Randhawa et al., 2016); a method‐based review (Sorescu et al., 2017); a review aiming for model/framework development (Paul, 2019; Paul & Mas, 2020); or a text mining approach (Bilro et al., 2021; Guerreiro & Rita, 2020; Loureiro et al., 2021; Muñoz‐Leiva et al., 2021). The current study is based on the text mining approach, which extracts useful information from a large collection of data in a semi‐autonomic way, otherwise considered as humanly impossible or unrealistically time‐consuming.…”