2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.j051524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Master Formula for Geometrically Nonlinear Dynamic Instability of Shear Flexible Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, it is demonstrated intuitively that, provided the stability and vibration mode forms are same, the dynamic stability bounds derived with adequate non-dimensional parameters are the equal regardless of the boundary conditions. In [3], it is suggested that these non-dimensional parameters may be rigorously determined, and for the majority of structural members, it is shown that there are master dynamic instability curves that are valid for all structural members, regardless of boundary condition or complicating effects. If the requirement of the exactness of the mode shapes, but not the similarity as mentioned in [2], is broken while trying to get the master dynamic stability curves, the error involved in the analysis is dependent on the deviation of these mode shapes and may be evaluated by calculating the corresponding L 2 norms [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, it is demonstrated intuitively that, provided the stability and vibration mode forms are same, the dynamic stability bounds derived with adequate non-dimensional parameters are the equal regardless of the boundary conditions. In [3], it is suggested that these non-dimensional parameters may be rigorously determined, and for the majority of structural members, it is shown that there are master dynamic instability curves that are valid for all structural members, regardless of boundary condition or complicating effects. If the requirement of the exactness of the mode shapes, but not the similarity as mentioned in [2], is broken while trying to get the master dynamic stability curves, the error involved in the analysis is dependent on the deviation of these mode shapes and may be evaluated by calculating the corresponding L 2 norms [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%