2009
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/85/60011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Master stability functions for coupled nearly identical dynamical systems

Abstract: We derive a master stability function (MSF) for synchronization in networks of coupled dynamical systems with small but arbitrary parametric variations. Analogous to the MSF for identical systems, our generalized MSF simultaneously solves the linear stability problem for near-synchronous states (NSS) for all possible connectivity structures. We also derive a general sufficient condition for stable near-synchronization and show that the synchronization error scales linearly with the magnitude of parameter varia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
182
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
182
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among such phase oscillators networks, the often encountered and most thoroughly studied case is that of anti-symmetric coupling without higher-order harmonics, that is, the oscillator network (1) with sinusoidal coupling. Moreover, the coupled oscillator model (1) serves as the prototypical example for synchronization in complex networks (Strogatz, 2001;Boccaletti et al, 2006;Osipov et al, 2007;Suykens and Osipov, 2008;Arenas et al, 2008), and its linearization is the well-known consensus protocol studied in networked control, see the surveys and monographs (Olfati-Saber et al, 2007;Ren et al, 2007;Bullo et al, 2009;Garin and Schenato, 2010;Mesbahi and Egerstedt, 2010). Indeed, numerous control scientists explored the coupled oscillator model (1) as a nonlinear generalization of the consensus protocol (Jadbabaie et al, 2004;Moreau, 2005;Scardovi et al, 2007;Olfati-Saber, 2006;Lin et al, 2007;Chopra and Spong, 2009;Sarlette and Sepulchre, 2009;Sepulchre, 2011).…”
Section: Canonical Model and Prototypical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among such phase oscillators networks, the often encountered and most thoroughly studied case is that of anti-symmetric coupling without higher-order harmonics, that is, the oscillator network (1) with sinusoidal coupling. Moreover, the coupled oscillator model (1) serves as the prototypical example for synchronization in complex networks (Strogatz, 2001;Boccaletti et al, 2006;Osipov et al, 2007;Suykens and Osipov, 2008;Arenas et al, 2008), and its linearization is the well-known consensus protocol studied in networked control, see the surveys and monographs (Olfati-Saber et al, 2007;Ren et al, 2007;Bullo et al, 2009;Garin and Schenato, 2010;Mesbahi and Egerstedt, 2010). Indeed, numerous control scientists explored the coupled oscillator model (1) as a nonlinear generalization of the consensus protocol (Jadbabaie et al, 2004;Moreau, 2005;Scardovi et al, 2007;Olfati-Saber, 2006;Lin et al, 2007;Chopra and Spong, 2009;Sarlette and Sepulchre, 2009;Sepulchre, 2011).…”
Section: Canonical Model and Prototypical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general oscillator networks display the same phenomenology, but the threshold from incoherence to synchrony is generally unknown. Finally, we remark that for oscillator networks of dimension n ≥ 3, this loss of synchrony via a saddle-node bifurcation is only the starting point of a series of bifurcations occurring if the coupling is further decreased, see Tönjes, 2007;Popovych et al, 2005;Suykens and Osipov, 2008).…”
Section: A Simple Yet Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations