INET Working Paper Series 2020
DOI: 10.36687/inetwp136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masters of Illusion: Bank and Regulatory Accounting for Losses in Distressed Banks

Abstract: This essay is part of a larger work on the history of Federal Reserve policymaking entitled Banking on Bull. The study seeks to explain why the instruments of central banking inevitably break down over time. A big part of the explanation is that policymakers want accounting measures of bank net worth to be flexible enough to allow bankers and regulators to slow the release of adverse information about distressed banks, particularly very large ones. Modern regulatory frameworks focus on maintaining what can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central bankers, given the task to safeguard the stability of the financial system, are in the stranglehold of financial speculators, who, using the ultra-low interest rates, continue to speculate, taking excessive risks, while knowingly betting on a persistent and unconditional policy backstop. Hence, central bank Quantitative Easing (QE) policies designed to help reduce systemic risks in financial systems, are, paradoxically, enlarging these risks -driven by low interest rates and the growing mismatch between abundant liquidity and a relative shortage of safe financial assets (Palma 2020;Kane 2020).…”
Section: The Oppressive Power Of Functionless Financial Investorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central bankers, given the task to safeguard the stability of the financial system, are in the stranglehold of financial speculators, who, using the ultra-low interest rates, continue to speculate, taking excessive risks, while knowingly betting on a persistent and unconditional policy backstop. Hence, central bank Quantitative Easing (QE) policies designed to help reduce systemic risks in financial systems, are, paradoxically, enlarging these risks -driven by low interest rates and the growing mismatch between abundant liquidity and a relative shortage of safe financial assets (Palma 2020;Kane 2020).…”
Section: The Oppressive Power Of Functionless Financial Investorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But parental resources may also be mobilized at the higher education level, especially in the case of academic difficulty. The literature on higher education has long highlighted financial barriers (for example, Goldrick-Rab, 2016; Kane, 1995) and more recently information biases (Abbiati and Barone, 2017;Usher, 2005) as drivers of social inequalities in higher education and it is possible that such barriers faced by disadvantaged students become even more salient in the case academic failure. In the case academic failure, it may become necessary to activate, for example, additional information to re-orientate, find additional funds to pay for an extra year of education or to invest in private tutoring.…”
Section: The Compensatory Advantage Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the role of valuation in resolution see (SRB 2019) (EBA 2017) (de Groen, 2018)(Hellwig 2018). On the difficulty of implementing a valuation and supervisory regime that precludes forbearance see(Kane, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%