2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MatCarloRe: An integrated FT and Monte Carlo Simulink tool for the reliability assessment of dynamic fault tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution of a DFT is much different than the one of the SFT, because temporal and cross dependencies cannot be modelled and solved through Boolean algebra [17].…”
Section: Dynamic Fault Tree Construction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of a DFT is much different than the one of the SFT, because temporal and cross dependencies cannot be modelled and solved through Boolean algebra [17].…”
Section: Dynamic Fault Tree Construction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are used particularly for analyzing DFT models to perform dynamic reliability assessment [48,49]. They mainly employ Monte Carlo simulation with the aim of overcoming the limitations of analytical methods such as state space explosion and lack of modularity in analysis [47]. There also exist studies that benefit from Bayesian Network (BN) that is a powerful method for probabilistic reasoning, particularly taking into account the complex dependencies in components and uncertainty in modeling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are usually derived based on fault trees [16,46] that are provided as input. As an alternative approach to analytical resolution, there also exist simulation techniques and tools [47] applied on fault tree models. They are used particularly for analyzing DFT models to perform dynamic reliability assessment [48,49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main disadvantages of the use of simulation is the high effort that it requires for making the system model and data preparation (Kawauchi and Rausand, 1999). To this regard, new approaches are introducing the use of some conventional modeling techniques such as RBD or FTA for simulation purposes (Macchi et al, 2012;Manno et al, 2012;Roda et al, 2013). In fact the RBD logic has the advantages of giving a systemic, integrated and very compact view of the system with a bottom-up perspective, while keeping an easy implementation approach.…”
Section: Fig 13 Tools For the Performance Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%