2019
DOI: 10.18488/journal.90.2019.62.44.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Match Running Performance of Elite Soccer Players and Correlations with Anthropometric and Power Indexes

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate possible correlations between a) jumping ability (squat jump and countermovement jump performance) and c) anthropometric indexes with the distances covered at different intensities during soccer matches by Greek elite soccer players (n=11). Match running performance was analyzed using a global positioning system (GPS) within the second division professional league. Body weight and height were moderately correlated with the distance that was covered in the first half wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is debate as to whether inter-limb strength asymmetry impairs sports performance. The literature suggests that inter-limb strength asymmetry appears to have a negative effect on performance in jumping, sprinting and change of direction (COD) (Bell et al, 2014;Michailidis et al, 2020;. However, there is also evidence to suggest that inter-limb strength asymmetry may not always negatively impact performance Dos'Santos et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is debate as to whether inter-limb strength asymmetry impairs sports performance. The literature suggests that inter-limb strength asymmetry appears to have a negative effect on performance in jumping, sprinting and change of direction (COD) (Bell et al, 2014;Michailidis et al, 2020;. However, there is also evidence to suggest that inter-limb strength asymmetry may not always negatively impact performance Dos'Santos et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%