2013
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MATCHCLIP: locate precise breakpoints for copy number variation using CIGAR string by matching soft clipped reads

Abstract: Copy number variations (CNVs) are associated with many complex diseases. Next generation sequencing data enable one to identify precise CNV breakpoints to better under the underlying molecular mechanisms and to design more efficient assays. Using the CIGAR strings of the reads, we develop a method that can identify the exact CNV breakpoints, and in cases when the breakpoints are in a repeated region, the method reports a range where the breakpoints can slide. Our method identifies the breakpoints of a CNV usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four other packages which use split-read information to infer breakpoints were also used in this study. Pindel ( Ye et al, 2009 ), DELLY ( Rausch et al, 2012 ), SoftSearch ( Hart et al, 2013 ), and MATCHCLIP ( Wu et al, 2013 ). Pindel uses paired-end information as its main approach.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four other packages which use split-read information to infer breakpoints were also used in this study. Pindel ( Ye et al, 2009 ), DELLY ( Rausch et al, 2012 ), SoftSearch ( Hart et al, 2013 ), and MATCHCLIP ( Wu et al, 2013 ). Pindel uses paired-end information as its main approach.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DELLY also uses paired-end information to obtain putative boundaries of SVs, and then infers breakpoints by aligning unmapped or partially mapped reads around the SVs to the reference genome. In contrast, both SoftSearch and MATCHCLIP do not use the realignment step, they use split-read information directly from BAM files to infer breakpoints ( Hart et al, 2013 ; Wu et al, 2013 ). SoftSearch and MATCHCLIP are single-sample based tools (one sample in each analysis) while Pindel and DELLY can use single or multiple samples.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is computationally taxing, so different methods use different heuristics to guide read alignment. MATCHCLIP (Wu et al, 2013 ) studies CIGAR strings (Li et al, 2009 ) to find reads with long soft clipped segments that overlap. The Pindel tool (Ye et al, 2009 ) looks for paired reads for which one read did not align to the reference, then searches nearby for split read mapping of the unaligned read.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next generation of sequencing (NGS) allows us to identify CNVs of smaller sizes, to define the exact location of CNVs in the genome (WU et al, 2013) and to distinguish homozygous and heterozygous (WANG; BYERS, 2014). However, the method is still relatively expensive, time-consuming and with a high level of false positives (WANG; BYERS, 2014).…”
Section: Identification Of Cnvmentioning
confidence: 99%