2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-010-9149-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching based very large-scale neighborhoods for parallel machine scheduling

Abstract: In this paper we study very large-scale neighborhoods for the minimum total weighted completion time problem on parallel machines, which is known to be strongly N P-hard. We develop two different ideas leading to very large-scale neighborhoods in which the best improving neighbor can be determined by calculating a weighted matching. The first neighborhood is introduced in a general fashion using combined operations of a basic neighborhood. Several examples for basic neighborhoods are given. The second approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good example of the second type of VLSN approach is the ‘matching’ neighbourhood for the TSP (Sarvanov and Doroshko, 1981), which was later adapted to several other problems, such as scheduling problems (Brueggemann and Hurink, 2007, 2011) and the GAP (Mitrović‐Minić and Punnen, 2008, 2009).…”
Section: Some Other Matheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good example of the second type of VLSN approach is the ‘matching’ neighbourhood for the TSP (Sarvanov and Doroshko, 1981), which was later adapted to several other problems, such as scheduling problems (Brueggemann and Hurink, 2007, 2011) and the GAP (Mitrović‐Minić and Punnen, 2008, 2009).…”
Section: Some Other Matheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brueggemann and Hurink [7] presented a neighborhood of exponential size for the problem of scheduling independent jobs on parallel machines minimizing the weighted average completion time. The neighborhood can be searched through matchings in a certain improvement neighborhood.…”
Section: Neighborhoods Defined By Assignments and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majid et al [23] used this algorithm to solve supply chain network design problems. Brueggemann and Hurink [24] used this algorithm to solve a parallel machine scheduling problem. Guo et al [25] and Fanjul-Peyro and Ruiz [26] used this algorithm to solve parallel machines scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%