2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00961.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching Martian crustal magnetization and magnetic properties of Martian meteorites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not discuss paleomagnetic studies of iron meteorites and pallasites due to their poorly understood magnetic field recording properties (e.g., Guskova 1965b;Brecher and Albright 1977;. We also do not discuss the extensive work in lunar (reviewed by Fuller 1974Fuller , 2007Hood and Cisowski 1983;Fuller and Cisowski 1987;Dunlop and Ozdemir 1997;Wieczorek et al 2006) and Martian paleomagnetism (see Rochette et al 2001Rochette et al , 2005Rochette et al , 2006Fuller 2007;Acuña et al 2008) except as they relate to the general context of extraterrestrial paleomagnetism. Although most work on meteorites took place in the 1970s and early 1980s (see previous reviews by Levy and Sonett 1978;Hood and Cisowski 1983;Collinson 1992Collinson , 1994Dunlop and Ozdemir 1997;Fuller 2007;Rochette et al 2009b), there has recently been a burst of activity brought on by advances in paleomagnetic techniques and instrumentation, an increasingly numerous and diverse sample suite, advances in dynamo theory, and perhaps most importantly, a growing petrologic and geochemical dataset that is providing crucial contextual and geochronological information for understanding the nature and origin of remanent magnetization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We do not discuss paleomagnetic studies of iron meteorites and pallasites due to their poorly understood magnetic field recording properties (e.g., Guskova 1965b;Brecher and Albright 1977;. We also do not discuss the extensive work in lunar (reviewed by Fuller 1974Fuller , 2007Hood and Cisowski 1983;Fuller and Cisowski 1987;Dunlop and Ozdemir 1997;Wieczorek et al 2006) and Martian paleomagnetism (see Rochette et al 2001Rochette et al , 2005Rochette et al , 2006Fuller 2007;Acuña et al 2008) except as they relate to the general context of extraterrestrial paleomagnetism. Although most work on meteorites took place in the 1970s and early 1980s (see previous reviews by Levy and Sonett 1978;Hood and Cisowski 1983;Collinson 1992Collinson , 1994Dunlop and Ozdemir 1997;Fuller 2007;Rochette et al 2009b), there has recently been a burst of activity brought on by advances in paleomagnetic techniques and instrumentation, an increasingly numerous and diverse sample suite, advances in dynamo theory, and perhaps most importantly, a growing petrologic and geochemical dataset that is providing crucial contextual and geochronological information for understanding the nature and origin of remanent magnetization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, the maximum depth to the Curie isotherm for the above minerals ranges from $16 km for pyrrhotite to $33 km for hematite. Depending on grain size, all of the above minerals are capable of providing magnetization intensities of the required magnitudes [Kletetschka et al, 2003;Rochette et al, 2005].…”
Section: Demagnetization By Low-velocity Secondary Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this depth is rather arbitrary and actually depends on the magnetic mineral carrying the remanence and the crustal temperature gradient at the time of dynamo shutdown (see discussion in Kletetschka et al, 2000;Rochette et al, 2001Rochette et al, , 2005Dunlop and Arkhani-Ahmed, 2005). Spatial variations in this steady field can be used to delineate the NRM direction and intensity of subsurface formations.…”
Section: Application Of Surface Magnetic Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the large magnetic field pulse associated with lightning current induces a large isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM). According to a survey of martian meteorites, the expected range of saturation IRM is 10-1,000 A/m (Rochette et al, 2005). Lightning NRM is usually a few tenths of saturation IRM (Wasilewsky and Dickinson, 2000;Verrier and Rochette, 2002).…”
Section: Application Of Surface Magnetic Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation