2016
DOI: 10.5114/fmpcr.2016.63710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching user needs to technology in dementia care: experiences with the Alma Supervisor Educational Program

Abstract: The number of individuals with dementia in Norway is more than 78,000, and, as in all other European countries, this figure is expected to rise over the coming decades. The Norwegian Health Directorate encourages municipalities to make use of 'welfare technology' in order to contribute to independent living and quality of life in older adults, to increase the quality of community health care, to save time when providing community health services and to reduce costs, e.g. admission to a nursing home. Introducin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In‐depth knowledge of patients and their needs can be crucial in terms of assigning the right service to the right patient. It can also be important, for example, to identify increased cognitive failure and evaluate when patients are no longer able to handle the technology, as pointed out in this study, as well as by Morley and Floridi (2019), and Holte and Wulff‐Jacobsen (2016). Technologies that are thought to be beneficial and to enhance safety might, in fact, not be suitable if the patient is not getting the help he or she needs, as demonstrated by Stokke (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In‐depth knowledge of patients and their needs can be crucial in terms of assigning the right service to the right patient. It can also be important, for example, to identify increased cognitive failure and evaluate when patients are no longer able to handle the technology, as pointed out in this study, as well as by Morley and Floridi (2019), and Holte and Wulff‐Jacobsen (2016). Technologies that are thought to be beneficial and to enhance safety might, in fact, not be suitable if the patient is not getting the help he or she needs, as demonstrated by Stokke (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, one of the participants was happy about using a medication dispenser but said that, if she had the choice, she would still prefer to have a person come with the medication, because of loneliness. Reduced visits can also be challenging for health professionals as regards identifying whether, for example, a service user’s cognitive function is decreasing, and evaluating whether service users can no longer handle the technology, as pointed out in another study [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-creating AT with users has steadily improved over time. Carers need to be involved in the design and testing of AT solutions and in prioritising the problems that need to be addressed to allow AT to be accepted as a solution for caring for people living with dementia in the community [121, 122].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%