2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2010.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching with sizes (or scheduling with processing set restrictions)

Abstract: Matching problems on bipartite graphs where the entities on one side may have different sizes are intimately related to scheduling problems with processing set restrictions. We survey the close relationship between these two problems, and give new approximation algorithms for the (NP-hard) variations of the problems in which the sizes of the jobs are restricted. Specifically, we give an approximation algorithm with an additive error of one when the sizes of the jobs are either 1 or 2, and generalise this to an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 For the third case with corequisites (i.e., an applicant can attend a course if and only if she attends all its corequisites) we propose another modification of the sequential allocation mechanism for finding Pareto optimal matchings. If the corequisites for all the applicants are the same, the model is closely related to matchings with sizes [7] or many-tomany matchings with price-budget constraints [13], and we strengthen the existing results by showing that the problem of finding a maximum size Pareto optimal matching is not approximable within N 1−ε , for any ε > 0, unless P=NP, where N is the total capacity of the applicants.…”
Section: Our Contributionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…1 For the third case with corequisites (i.e., an applicant can attend a course if and only if she attends all its corequisites) we propose another modification of the sequential allocation mechanism for finding Pareto optimal matchings. If the corequisites for all the applicants are the same, the model is closely related to matchings with sizes [7] or many-tomany matchings with price-budget constraints [13], and we strengthen the existing results by showing that the problem of finding a maximum size Pareto optimal matching is not approximable within N 1−ε , for any ε > 0, unless P=NP, where N is the total capacity of the applicants.…”
Section: Our Contributionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…If couples are involved, the problem becomes hard. More precisely, the decision version of this problem is NP-complete [13,3], even in the special case where each hospital has a capacity of 2, and the acceptable hospital pairs for a couple are always of the form (h, h) for some h ∈ H. However, if the number of couples is small, which is a reasonable assumption in many practical applications, Maximum Matching with Couples becomes tractable, as shown by Theorem 1. We will use the following lemma to solve a special case of the Maximum Matching with Couples problem.…”
Section: Fixed-parameter Tractabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was proved to be NPcomplete even if p = 2 (see [13,3]), so investigating the parameterized complexity of this problem might be of practical importance.…”
Section: An Application In Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the schools do not have preferences over applicants. An existing problem in the literature that most closely resembles this case is called Matching with Couples [7], which is essentially the same as the Hospitals / Residents problem with Couples where agents are indifferent between all members of their preference lists. However we emphasize that our model differs from all of those discussed so far due to the applicants' specialization in two subjects and the schools being allowed to have different capacities for different subjects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%