2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(01)00087-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matchings and Hadwiger's Conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now know the structure of G up to vertex c-duplication-G is an inflation of the complement of the Petersen graph ((ii) holds). This proves (2 ). If (2 )(i) holds, then G\(M 1 ∪ N 1 ) and G\(M 2 ∪ N 2 ) are disconnected.…”
Section: Conclusion Conjectures and Future Worksupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We now know the structure of G up to vertex c-duplication-G is an inflation of the complement of the Petersen graph ((ii) holds). This proves (2 ). If (2 )(i) holds, then G\(M 1 ∪ N 1 ) and G\(M 2 ∪ N 2 ) are disconnected.…”
Section: Conclusion Conjectures and Future Worksupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, we have quite a bit of control on the counterexamples. Note that the proof of Theorem 3.2 mentions the good edge axiom and uses the special choices (I) and (II) for the partition only in step (2). By an easy argument from the proof of Theorem A.1, any counterexample must have exactly two components of medium edges, L and R, with at least two dipoles in each.…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following theorem is well known in the literature regarding Hadwiger's conjecture (See Kotlov [17] for an alternate proof. )…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%