In many animals, decision-making is influenced by social learning, i.e. the acquisition of insights through the observation of other individuals' behaviours. In cases where such socially obtained information conflicts with personally acquired knowledge, animals must weigh up one form of information against the other. Previous studies have found that individual animals differ consistently in how they trade-off socially versus personally acquired knowledge, but why this is so remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate whether an animal's cognitive profile affects its decision to use either prior personal or new, conflicting social information, using the Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) as our model species. We trained lizards to associate one of two colour cues with food, and subsequently allowed them to observe a conspecific trained for the opposite colour. After social demonstrations, lizards overall tended to use the 'fake', non-rewarding social information, but some individuals were more likely to do so than others. Lizards that showed faster spatial learning were more likely to copy social information even in the presence of reliable previous knowledge. Our study highlights the existence of significant inter-individual variation in social learning in a lizard, possibly mirroring variation in cognitive abilities.
Significance statementAnimals often use social information in daily decision-making. Whenever knowledge obtained through personal experience conflicts with observations of decisions made by conspecifics, individuals must weigh these two types of information against each other. Individuals tend to differ in whether they prioritize social versus private information, but why this is so, remains poorly understood. Using lizards, we tested whether an animal's cognitive profile affects its decision to use either prior personal or new, conflicting social information. We found considerable variation among individuals in social information use and tendency to rely on personal or public knowledge. Specifically, faster spatial learners inclined to copy social information, even in the presence of reliable previous knowledge, suggesting that intrinsic, cognitive aspects influence how individuals trade-off public and private information.