2001
DOI: 10.1080/10236240109379075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate recognition and pairing in the big‐clawed snapping shrimp,Alpheus heterochelis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All our trials were performed between two individuals (no opportunity for choice between individuals) and all shrimp were housed individually when not in a trial; under these conditions, preference strengths (for large males in female A. heterochaelis and pre-molt females in A. angulosus) may have been reduced, thereby also reducing the use of investigatory behaviors. Similarly, as all interactions were between unfamiliar individuals, effects of familiarity (Rahman et al 2001) could not be detected. Finally, our experiments were performed with inter-molt individuals.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…All our trials were performed between two individuals (no opportunity for choice between individuals) and all shrimp were housed individually when not in a trial; under these conditions, preference strengths (for large males in female A. heterochaelis and pre-molt females in A. angulosus) may have been reduced, thereby also reducing the use of investigatory behaviors. Similarly, as all interactions were between unfamiliar individuals, effects of familiarity (Rahman et al 2001) could not be detected. Finally, our experiments were performed with inter-molt individuals.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Nolan and Salmon, 1970;Duffy et al, 2002) and interspecific (defense). In Alpheus, sexual pairs are size matched, with females generally having a slightly larger body (Schein, 1975;Hughes, 1996;Rahman et al, 2002) and relatively smaller major chela than males do (e.g. Dawes, 1934;Nolan and Salmon, 1970;Schein, 1975Schein, , 1977Knowlton ,1980;Boltana and Thiel, 2001;Mathews, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…data), and therefore, variation in female quality exists with regard to reproductive success for male mates. Males and females share a shelter, which they defend from intruders, and which could hence make territory holding potential an important variable in mate choice (Rahman et al, 2003). Asymmetry in reproductive investment, as discussed in the Introduction, as well as sexual dimorphism, suggest that sexual selection might play a role in the mating system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Alternatively, the greater interfemale aggression could also serve to prevent a male pairing with multiple females, because a male shuttling between females will not be as reliably present as a monogamous male. Females showed a pairing bias against mates that were absent for 24 h (Rahman et al, 2001), which could also be a tactic by females to avoid multiple pairing by males, who would be less reliably present.…”
Section: Mate-choice and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 98%