2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material and manufacturing cost considerations for thermoelectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
290
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
290
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermoelectric (TE) materials, which have the capability of converting heat directly into electricity under a temperature gradient, have been regarded as an alternative option to alleviate energy shortage. 1 Though TE devices have already been applied in deep space exploration and solid state cooling, 2,3 the relatively low energy conversion efficiency limits their wide commercialization, 4 which is mainly constrained by the performance of TE materials as characterized by the dimensionless figure of merit, zT = α 2 σT/(κ e + κ L ), where α is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, κ e and κ L are, respectively, the electronic and lattice contributions to the total thermal conductivity κ, and T is the absolute temperature. 5 Since all three physical properties (α, σ, and κ) are carrier concentration dependent, zT could reach its maximum value at an optimized carrier concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermoelectric (TE) materials, which have the capability of converting heat directly into electricity under a temperature gradient, have been regarded as an alternative option to alleviate energy shortage. 1 Though TE devices have already been applied in deep space exploration and solid state cooling, 2,3 the relatively low energy conversion efficiency limits their wide commercialization, 4 which is mainly constrained by the performance of TE materials as characterized by the dimensionless figure of merit, zT = α 2 σT/(κ e + κ L ), where α is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, κ e and κ L are, respectively, the electronic and lattice contributions to the total thermal conductivity κ, and T is the absolute temperature. 5 Since all three physical properties (α, σ, and κ) are carrier concentration dependent, zT could reach its maximum value at an optimized carrier concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] More recently, the ZT values of conventional thermoelectric materials have been significantly improved to new records in the laboratory through nanotechnology, chemical doping, and engineering of electronic structure. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] For example, a ZT of 2.4 for Bi-Sb-Te superlattice was achieved at 300 K, and a ZT of 2.2 for Sr-, Na-doped bulk PbTe was realized at 915 K. [14,17] I-doped bulk Cu2Se exhibited a ZT of 2.3 at 400 K, [18] and its analogue Cu2S had a ZT of 0.5 at 673 K. [19] The high ZT and low cost of metal chalcogenides make them very promising in heat conversion. [20] It has been demonstrated that the improvement of ZT in most metal chalcogenides in recent reports is attributable to the introduction of nano-precipitates (or nanograins), which can effectively decrease their thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] For example, a ZT of 2.4 for Bi-Sb-Te superlattice was achieved at 300 K, and a ZT of 2.2 for Sr-, Na-doped bulk PbTe was realized at 915 K. [14,17] I-doped bulk Cu2Se exhibited a ZT of 2.3 at 400 K, [18] and its analogue Cu2S had a ZT of 0.5 at 673 K. [19] The high ZT and low cost of metal chalcogenides make them very promising in heat conversion. [20] It has been demonstrated that the improvement of ZT in most metal chalcogenides in recent reports is attributable to the introduction of nano-precipitates (or nanograins), which can effectively decrease their thermal conductivity. Although most metal chalcogenide nanostructures could be synthesized via ball milling in large scale, [7][8]11,[13][14][21][22] this process is time-consuming, and the resultant nanostructures have a broad size distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Recently, ultralow thermal conductivities of 0.4-0.5 Wm -1 K -1 resulting from bonding anharmonicity where weakly bound cations act as rattlers were observed in metal tellurides. 11,12 As part of the search for materials based on less toxic and/or scarce components 13,14 that can operate under more demanding conditions including the broad temperature ranges required for some applications (automotive exhaust waste heat recovery: 350-700 K, industrial furnace waste heat recovery: 700-1100 K), 15,16 there is growing interest in thermoelectric oxides. 17,18 However, the strategies used to design high-performance thermoelectric materials based on small band gap, broad-band semiconductors and intermetallics cannot be translated directly to oxide materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%