2005
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material cloud method for topology optimization

Abstract: SUMMARYMaterial cloud method (MCM), a new approach for topology optimization, is presented. In MCM, an optimal structure can be obtained by manipulating the sizes and positions of material clouds, which are material patches with finite sizes and constant material densities. The optimal distributions of material clouds can be obtained by MCM using fixed background finite element meshes. In the numerical analysis procedure, only active elements, where more than one material cloud is contained, are treated. Optim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, they use a fixed FE grid for numerical analysis, thus design results are highly dependent on the initial fixed computational mesh. Although the studies on design space expansion were presented in 2D problems (Chang and Youn, 2006;Jang and Kwak, 2008), the initial grid dependency problem is very difficult to resolve in optimization of shell problems. Moreover, the topology optimization methods which use cell-based representation such as SIMP, ESC, ECP and MC, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, they use a fixed FE grid for numerical analysis, thus design results are highly dependent on the initial fixed computational mesh. Although the studies on design space expansion were presented in 2D problems (Chang and Youn, 2006;Jang and Kwak, 2008), the initial grid dependency problem is very difficult to resolve in optimization of shell problems. Moreover, the topology optimization methods which use cell-based representation such as SIMP, ESC, ECP and MC, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECP can provide excellent designs in geometrically nonlinear problems since unrealistic effect on distortion of low density elements is eliminated. The material cloud (MC) method was proposed by Chang and Youn (2006). The optimal topology is expressed by means of the material clouds and the size and/or position of them are design variables in the material cloud method based topology optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can observe over the last two decades the implementation of various specific methods ranging from gradient-based approaches, e.g., Reference [6], where mathematical models are derived to calculate the sensitivities of design variables to non-gradient-based ones, where the material is redistributed using various, usually heuristic techniques. In what follows, the generation of optimal topologies involves, among others, evolutionary ESO/BESO structural optimization [11,12], genetic algorithms [13,14], other biologically inspired algorithms [15,16], the material cloud method [17], spline based topology optimization [18], level set method [19,20], cellular automata [21,22,23,24,25,26] or the moving morphable components approach [27,28]. It can be seen from the above that traditional gradient-based mathematical programming algorithms are more readily replaced by novel and efficient heuristic methods inspired by biological, chemical or physical phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaveh et al, 2008), material cloud method (e.g. Chang and Youn, 2006), spline-based topology optimization (e.g. Eschenauer et al, 1993) and level set method (e.g.…”
Section: Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%