2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material configurational forces applied to mixed mode crack propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the estimated crack growth path agreed the experimental path observed by [ 48 ]. In addition, the predicted crack propagation direction agrees with the predicted trajectories of other previous numerical [ 49 , 50 ], and [ 47 ]. The study in [ 49 ] utilizes FEM based on local Lepp–Delaunay meshes refinement, the work [ 50 ] uses FEM with configurational forces, and the method in [ 47 ] applies coupled extended mesh free–smoothed mesh free method.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that the estimated crack growth path agreed the experimental path observed by [ 48 ]. In addition, the predicted crack propagation direction agrees with the predicted trajectories of other previous numerical [ 49 , 50 ], and [ 47 ]. The study in [ 49 ] utilizes FEM based on local Lepp–Delaunay meshes refinement, the work [ 50 ] uses FEM with configurational forces, and the method in [ 47 ] applies coupled extended mesh free–smoothed mesh free method.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the predicted crack propagation direction agrees with the predicted trajectories of other previous numerical [ 49 , 50 ], and [ 47 ]. The study in [ 49 ] utilizes FEM based on local Lepp–Delaunay meshes refinement, the work [ 50 ] uses FEM with configurational forces, and the method in [ 47 ] applies coupled extended mesh free–smoothed mesh free method. The results were compared to the finite element results obtained in [ 27 ] uses ViDa program as shown in Figure 15 a–f, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fracture mechanics, the driving force of crack growth is the variation in the total energy near the crack tip. The total energy release rate is determined as a function of crack propagation (Guo and Li, 2017). In an I-TDM coupling system, the energy associated with temperature and fission product diffusion must be accounted for to construct the energy balance in a closed contour around the crack tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J integral physically indicates the energy release rate for the defect translation, and the conservation theorem was used to prove that the J integral is independent of the integration path around a stationary defect (Noether, 1971). Therefore, the J integral has been widely used to predict the start and the direction of crack propagation (Kaczmarczyk et al, 2014;Ö zenç et al, 2016;Guo and Li, 2017), effective fracture toughness of heterogeneous media (Hossain et al, 2014;Kuhn and Müller, 2016) and damage evolution inside the materials (Yuan and Li, 2019). When the J integral is applied to the stationary dislocation, the J integral is equal to the Peach-Koehler (PK) force acting on it (Eshelby, 1956).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%