2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0051885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material considerations for the design of 2D/3D hot electron transistors

Abstract: Combining two- and three-dimensional (2D/3D) materials provides a unique route to enabling next-generation hot electron transistors (HETs)—a vertical ballistic device, promising for high-frequency applications since they are not limited by electron velocity saturation, fabrication limitations, or short channel effects. The early demonstrations of HETs suffered from poor material and interface qualities and thick device components. The revival of the HET, with a cut-off predicted frequency above 1 THz, can be c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when a disordered EG buffer is used, the CHet process leads to the formation of 2D metal oxides (GaO x , InO x , and SnO x , precise stoichiometry unknown) at the QFEG/SiC interface, confirmed by the absence of a 2D metal Raman MLFF (Figure 2a) and the metal oxide peaks in the Ga 3d (20.1 eV), In 3d (445.0 eV), Sn 3d (486.9 eV), and O 1s (531.0 ± 0.2 eV) regions (Figure 2b; Figure S5c-e, Supporting Information). Compositional analysis performed via XPS also confirms oxygen at the interface, where QFEG/GaO x exhibits [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] of SiC and corresponding EELS maps. Bilayer Ga or GaO x forms when Ga is intercalated through OB or DB, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, when a disordered EG buffer is used, the CHet process leads to the formation of 2D metal oxides (GaO x , InO x , and SnO x , precise stoichiometry unknown) at the QFEG/SiC interface, confirmed by the absence of a 2D metal Raman MLFF (Figure 2a) and the metal oxide peaks in the Ga 3d (20.1 eV), In 3d (445.0 eV), Sn 3d (486.9 eV), and O 1s (531.0 ± 0.2 eV) regions (Figure 2b; Figure S5c-e, Supporting Information). Compositional analysis performed via XPS also confirms oxygen at the interface, where QFEG/GaO x exhibits [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] of SiC and corresponding EELS maps. Bilayer Ga or GaO x forms when Ga is intercalated through OB or DB, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For simplicity, we focus on the positive bias regime because, in the negative bias regime (electron flow from n‐SiC to graphene), more than one conduction mechanism (e.g., tunneling and TE) is likely to contribute to the current flow at high electric fields. Charge transport across tunneling junctions is mainly governed by direct tunneling (DT) at a low electric field through a trapezoidal barrier and followed by Fowler‐Nordheim tunneling (FNT) through a triangular barrier at a high electric field (see methods) [ 11 ] . The low bias conductance across QFEG/Ga 2 O 3 /SiC, which should be governed by the DT model, is not measurable in the forward bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations