2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material flow analysis of RDF-production processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
100
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The heavy metal concentration in the waste fractions to be revalorized as refuse derived fuel (RDF) is also to be taken into consideration (Rotter, Kost, Winkler, & Bilitewski, 2004). It is possible that high concentrations of hazardous substances and heavy metals are found in local pockets (Kurian et al, 2003), since elements such as As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Hg and Zn can be found in household products (Slack, Gronow, & Voulvoulis, 2005) and, therefore, in landfill leachate (Reinhart, 1993) depending on the solubility of the respective phases.…”
Section: Metals Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heavy metal concentration in the waste fractions to be revalorized as refuse derived fuel (RDF) is also to be taken into consideration (Rotter, Kost, Winkler, & Bilitewski, 2004). It is possible that high concentrations of hazardous substances and heavy metals are found in local pockets (Kurian et al, 2003), since elements such as As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Hg and Zn can be found in household products (Slack, Gronow, & Voulvoulis, 2005) and, therefore, in landfill leachate (Reinhart, 1993) depending on the solubility of the respective phases.…”
Section: Metals Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of chlorine and mercury content in the RMSW in both case studies, literature data were used [27]. The chlorine and mercury contents are: 0.0040 and 0.0038 for Cl in % (DM) and 0.0078 and 0.0040 for Hg in mg/ MJ, respectively.…”
Section: Rdf and Srf Characterization And Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major inputs to the model include cost and energy consumption estimates for each piece of MRF equipment and the separation efficiencies for every modeled waste component associated with each piece of separation equipment, which are similar to the transfer coefficients used in Rotter et al (2004) and Velis et al (2010). MRF performance is directly related to the composition of the incoming waste stream, so a MRF process model should be capable of assessing performance associated with processing each waste component and accounting for changes to the incoming waste stream composition (e.g., waste with a higher ferrous fraction requires a larger magnet).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%