“…Several scholars have also developed other meshless methods to solve mechanical problems, such as the cracking particles method [35,36] and the reproducing kernel particle method [37] for describing dynamic crack propagation, the peridynamics-SPH method [38][39][40] for simulating the explosive fragmentation of soil, the deep energy method [41] for avoiding discretization, the nonlocal operator method [42,43] for solving partial differential equations of mechanical problems, the dual-horizon peridynamics method [44] for solving the problem of stray wave reflection with a variable horizon, the localized Fourier collocation method [45] for solving numerically large-scale boundary value problems with complex-shape geometries, the fluid-structure interaction [46] for investigating the problems of fluid-structure interaction, and the coupled model [47] for researching the buffer performance of the thin-walled circular tube in the launch safety problems. Compared to other meshless methods, the MPM has higher computational efficiency and accuracy, better tension stability, and can easily deal with material breakage and fluid-structure interactions [48][49][50]. During the launch process of an explosive charge affected by a bottom gap, the volume of gas in the bottom gap and generated by the combustion of developed can change greatly, and fluid-structure coupling can occur between the gas and the solid.…”