2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material properties of mandibular cortical bone in the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cross section was assumed to be constant along the length of the beam. Young's modulus was set at 15 GPa, the approximate mean elastic modulus of Alligator mandibular cortical bone from Zapata et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This cross section was assumed to be constant along the length of the beam. Young's modulus was set at 15 GPa, the approximate mean elastic modulus of Alligator mandibular cortical bone from Zapata et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam FEM is 189 mm in length, is composed of 64,071 solid hexahedral elements, and was given the same elastic modulus (15 GPa) as the Beam 2D model. Values for density (1772.6 kg/m 3 ) and Poisson's ratio (0.29) corresponding to the averages obtained for Alligator mandibular cortical bone (Zapata et al,2010) were applied. Material properties were assumed to be isotropic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single node at the tip of the caudal tooth and a single node in the middle of the articular surface of each quadrate bone were constrained in all three translational and all three rotational degrees of freedom. Material properties of alligator mandibular cortical bone were assigned to all elements of the FEM following Zapata et al (2010). The scope of this project prohibited the inclusion of cranial sutures in the models; further, the material properties of sutures in A. mississippiensis (or indeed, the material properties of cranial sutures in any reptile) are unknown.…”
Section: Feamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this study we have assumed that crocodilians and spinosaur theropod dinosaurs possess equivalent stiffness and shear values, and hence can be compared directly without consideration of potential differences in material properties. We will never know the exact material properties of extinct animal bone; however studies have shown that many taxonomically distinct vertebrates have similar moduli [56], and indeed there are similarities in the cranial material properties of crocodilian and mammalian bone [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%