2015
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1112096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material stocks in Germany's non-domestic buildings: a new quantification method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An acknowledged problem in literature is that gross estimates involving abstract proxies cannot be easily validated due to regional, typologic and other variations [19].…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An acknowledged problem in literature is that gross estimates involving abstract proxies cannot be easily validated due to regional, typologic and other variations [19].…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. The main problem lies in the reliability of estimating the metal composition of such indicators [19].…”
Section: Current Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of MFA studies have already investigated the built environment by analyzing stocks and flows and their dynamics [13], [15], [16]. These studies consider resource consumption and waste management at both ends of the material flow chain [17] as well as streams of C&D waste [18].…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…section 2.4), the authors apply a bottom-up approach using material composition indicators (MCI) as described in [13] and [55] to calculate material flows. The bottom-up calculations provide estimates of concrete inflow and outflow as well as the outflow of bricks (cf.…”
Section: Bottom-up Calculation Of Materials Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation