Archaeologies of Internment 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9666-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materialities and Traumatic Memories of a Twentieth-Century Greek Exile Island

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeological evidence suggests that human occupation in the island dates back to prehistory (Arhontidou-Argiri, 2005), however it is the forced movement of political exiles in the twentieth century to the island that has marked considerably this island's biography (Pantzou, 2011). The first political exiles, members of syndicates and socialist groups arrived on Ai Stratis in the 1920s together with bandits and animal rustlers in light of preventive administrative measures (Aris Tsouknidas, pers comm., 27 June 2014; see also Voglis, 2002: 92).…”
Section: From Memories To Historymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Archaeological evidence suggests that human occupation in the island dates back to prehistory (Arhontidou-Argiri, 2005), however it is the forced movement of political exiles in the twentieth century to the island that has marked considerably this island's biography (Pantzou, 2011). The first political exiles, members of syndicates and socialist groups arrived on Ai Stratis in the 1920s together with bandits and animal rustlers in light of preventive administrative measures (Aris Tsouknidas, pers comm., 27 June 2014; see also Voglis, 2002: 92).…”
Section: From Memories To Historymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Migrants leave behind a rich material record of those meaningful objects that they wished to take with them but ultimately could not, given the rigors and dangers of the journey. When rediscovered decades or generations later, these lost objects can be used to chronicle the trauma, pain, and survival of those who experienced border crossings, imprisonment, and other forced movements so that those experiences are not forgotten (Pantzou, 2011).…”
Section: What Migrants Carry And/or Discard Along the Journeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These identifications include unwanted heritage (Light 2000), which has been denied or airbrushed out of history; and places of pain and shame (Logan and Reeves 2009), those scars of history that bring shame upon us in the present. Other examples include traumatic heritage (Pantzou 2011), with its implications of gradual healing over time leading to a positive transformation and change; and uncomfortable heritage (Merrill 2010), which is associated either directly or indirectly with human death, pain and/or suffering, but which is distinguished by a focus on good practice in heritage management strategies rather than exploitation of its dark qualities for economic gain. Crucially, however, the heritagisation process is still possible in some form at sites of sensitive heritage if practitioners proceed with care, even if the results of that process of heritage creation are divisive.…”
Section: Settled Heritage Sensitive Heritage Taboo Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%