2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3457349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materiality of Sustainable Practices and Institutional Logics of Adoption: A Comparative Study of Chemical Road Transportation Companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observou-se que as lógicas apresentam especificidades em relação aos campos de estudo, portanto, há diferentes lógicas que abrangem os conceitos de sustentabilidade a depender do contexto institucional abordado. Foram identificados estudos em organizações públicas (ARGENTO et al, 2019), empreendimentos sem fins lucrativos (WATSON et al, 2020), empreendimentos sustentáveis (GREGORI; HOLZMANN, 2020), economia compartilhada (GRINEVICH et al, 2019), cooperativas (MITZINNECK; BESHAROV, 2019), empresas privadas (ROSSONI et al, 2020), dentre outros. No entanto, poucos estudos analisam as lógicas que influenciam as práticas de sustentabilidade de pequenas e médias empresas, que têm grande potencial de disseminação de valores da sustentabilidade (KIEFHABER; PAVLOVICH; SPRAUL, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Observou-se que as lógicas apresentam especificidades em relação aos campos de estudo, portanto, há diferentes lógicas que abrangem os conceitos de sustentabilidade a depender do contexto institucional abordado. Foram identificados estudos em organizações públicas (ARGENTO et al, 2019), empreendimentos sem fins lucrativos (WATSON et al, 2020), empreendimentos sustentáveis (GREGORI; HOLZMANN, 2020), economia compartilhada (GRINEVICH et al, 2019), cooperativas (MITZINNECK; BESHAROV, 2019), empresas privadas (ROSSONI et al, 2020), dentre outros. No entanto, poucos estudos analisam as lógicas que influenciam as práticas de sustentabilidade de pequenas e médias empresas, que têm grande potencial de disseminação de valores da sustentabilidade (KIEFHABER; PAVLOVICH; SPRAUL, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Both Thornton et al (2012) and Laasch (2017) argue that the normative goal of any firm in business is to maximise profits. As firms quote low prices so as to emerge as the lowest best-evaluated bidders, efficiency has to be ensured so as to make profits in addition to effectiveness (Arena et al, 2018;Jourdan, 2018;Rossoni et al, 2020). Although market logics may have a link with tendering capabilities of a firm, much of the research is done in developed nations with no focus on SMEs (Bergman and Lundberg, 2013;Dylst et al, 2011;Vogler et al, 2017) and is majorly atheoretical.…”
Section: Market Logics and Tendering Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Thornton et al (2012) and Laasch (2017) agree that the overall goal of every firm in business is to maximise profits. So as firms quote lower prices so as to emerge as the lowest best-evaluated bidders, efficiency is ensured so as to make profits (Arena et al, 2018;Jourdan, 2018;Rossoni et al, 2020).…”
Section: H4 Market Logics Positively Influence Tendering Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%