2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1lc00836f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials and methods for droplet microfluidic device fabrication

Abstract: Since the first reports two decades ago, droplet-based systems have emerged as a compelling tool for microbiological and (bio)chemical science, with droplet flow providing multiple advantages over standard single-phase microfluidics...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microfluidic device used a flow focusing droplet generator and was fabricated using soft lithography from PDMS. PDMS microfluidic devices are optimal for water-in-oil (w/o) droplet formation due to the hydrophobic nature of PDMS. , As oil-in-water (o/w) droplets were required for the fabrication of PCL microparticles, a hydrophilic substrate and surface modification of the PDMS device were used. In other words, the PDMS devices were bonded directly to a glass slide, and the channels were treated with a 2% (w/v) PVA solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microfluidic device used a flow focusing droplet generator and was fabricated using soft lithography from PDMS. PDMS microfluidic devices are optimal for water-in-oil (w/o) droplet formation due to the hydrophobic nature of PDMS. , As oil-in-water (o/w) droplets were required for the fabrication of PCL microparticles, a hydrophilic substrate and surface modification of the PDMS device were used. In other words, the PDMS devices were bonded directly to a glass slide, and the channels were treated with a 2% (w/v) PVA solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…162,163 The silanization of the PDMS devices serves to reduce "wetting effects" or friction at the channel walls, 164 and various surface modifications for hydrophobic or hydrophilic coating are available to match the carrier phase, allowing choices of different oils. 15 So-called "2.5D" designs (i.e., varying channel depth within the device) can be created by patterning several layers on the master in an iterative process. In this way, areas of the mask can have an additional buildup of material, leading to varying channel depths within the device.…”
Section: Chip Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDMS can also absorb 286,287 or transport 288 small molecules, suggesting a change of the chip material. 287,289 Finally the coating of the chip, i.e., surface modification for hydrophobic or hydrophilic coating to match the carrier phase, choice of oil, 15 or silanization of the PDMS devices (to reduce wetting effects or friction at the channel walls), 164 can be considered.…”
Section: Challenges To the Integrity Of The Droplet Compartmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wider use of DE techniques has been impeded by the increased complexity required to form water in oil in water emulsions. Typical DE generators use a 3-D nested channel geometry or step-wise emulsification which requires challenging alignment steps. , To simplify fabrication we established a single layer PDMS device and adapted easy-to-perform plasma treatment to spatially pattern the surface wetting . This approach eliminates all laborious fabrication and treatment steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%