Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications 2013
DOI: 10.1533/9780857097040.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials and methods for the microfabrication of microfluidic biomedical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
(252 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wet chemical etching is isotropic and produces rounded side wall microchannels. The depth of the these channels is controlled by the etch rate and etch duration whereas the width of the microchannel can be estimated by the mask opening plus twice the channel depth [49]. Therefore, high aspect ratio features are hard to build using these methods.…”
Section: Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wet chemical etching is isotropic and produces rounded side wall microchannels. The depth of the these channels is controlled by the etch rate and etch duration whereas the width of the microchannel can be estimated by the mask opening plus twice the channel depth [49]. Therefore, high aspect ratio features are hard to build using these methods.…”
Section: Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device is made of superimposed polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) sheets. This rigid thermoplastic is biocompatible, cost-effective, suitable for mass fabrication, and has excellent optical performance of light transmission [19,20]. A panel of different thicknesses of PMMA sheets is available.…”
Section: Materials For Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the thickness of the walls between the meandering channels is omitted in the theoretical analysis. In practice, using state-of-the-art nanofabrication, wall thicknesses down to 300 nm are easily feasible due to well-established vertical etch processes, 26 thereby not significantly impacting the conclusions from our calculations. To investigate the analyte transport to the binding sites, we have calculated the mass transfer coefficient, k m , and compared it to values of k on Γ 0 typical for protein interactions ( Figure 2 e).…”
Section: Infinite Sample Volumementioning
confidence: 99%