1941
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.239.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials for preparation of vertebrate fossils; an analysis of their effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early 1940s saw little further development in materials; however, Todd [19] described an effective method for the vacuum impregnation of fossil bone and shell using polyvinyl acetate, and Lewis and Lepper [20] carried out further tests which emphasized the suitability of Alvar for conserving friable vertebrate fossils. Alvar became, during the 1950s and 1960s, one of the most widely used plastics in palaeontology both in the UK, as Alvar 1570, and in the USA, as Alvar 17/20.…”
Section: Materials In Use Between 1940-1965mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early 1940s saw little further development in materials; however, Todd [19] described an effective method for the vacuum impregnation of fossil bone and shell using polyvinyl acetate, and Lewis and Lepper [20] carried out further tests which emphasized the suitability of Alvar for conserving friable vertebrate fossils. Alvar became, during the 1950s and 1960s, one of the most widely used plastics in palaeontology both in the UK, as Alvar 1570, and in the USA, as Alvar 17/20.…”
Section: Materials In Use Between 1940-1965mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another source of contamination is seen in the numerous substances used for hard-tissue conservation (Rixon, 1976;Brommelle et al, 1984;Horie, 1987;Collins, 1995). From the early 19th century up to the present, gelatine-based glue has been widely used, because it is cheap, easily available, and very effective (Lepper and Lewis, 1941;Shelton and Johnson, 1995). Although some authors have expressed suspicions that such conservation techniques may cause severe complications if not hindrance for the analysis of old biomolecules (Horie, 1987;Hall et al, 1993;Cooper, 1994;Shelton and Johnson, 1995), this source of experimental pitfalls is underestimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%