Archaeology After Interpretation 2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315434254-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials of Affect: Miniatures in the Scandinavian Late Iron Age (AD 550-1050)

Abstract: Chapter 11-Is the social unstable? Implicating artefacts in the study of continuity and change: A case study from Anglo-Norman Southampton-Ben Jervis Chapter 12-Assemblages, change and the duration of relations: lessons from engaging with Early Bronze Age mortuary practices in Northeast England-Chris Fowler Chapter 13-Archaeology of Placemaking and the Assembly of Monumental Worlds-Marcus Brittain PART IV Beyond Representation-Andrew Meirion Jones Chapter 14-Representational approaches to Irish passage tombs: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it facilitates disentangling taphonomic effects from intentional manipulation of the burnt bones after cremation. This helps to avoid over-interpreting the data as in the archaeological context a small cremation weight is often seen as evidence for pars-pro-toto [112]. The two urns discussed in this paper provide insights into the Bronze Age at the human scale, tracing each step of the burial ritual.…”
Section: Funerary Ritualsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, it facilitates disentangling taphonomic effects from intentional manipulation of the burnt bones after cremation. This helps to avoid over-interpreting the data as in the archaeological context a small cremation weight is often seen as evidence for pars-pro-toto [112]. The two urns discussed in this paper provide insights into the Bronze Age at the human scale, tracing each step of the burial ritual.…”
Section: Funerary Ritualsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In Viking archaeology, to decentre the human as the universal protagonist is not mainstream, yet is bubbling under the surface of contemporary scholarship. The notion of universal anthropocentric personhood in the Viking Age is currently being challenged, for instance through questioning whether we can assume that children were universally cherished social persons in first millennium CE Northern Europe (Eriksen 2017); whether ritually modified artefacts in Viking burial may have had aspects of personhood (Ratican forthcoming); and whether certain objects -such as the gold foil figures -were ontological equivalents to (some) humans (Back Danielsson 2013). Recently, Eriksen and Kay (2022) explicitly argue that the lines between humans and the other (whether building, sword, or animal) cannot be assumed to be drawn in the same way as in the present West, and that Iron and Viking-Age worlds were decidedly more-than-human, in unfamiliar ways.…”
Section: Multispecies Archaeology and The More-than-human Worlds Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2012, argues that miniature clay pots of La Candelaria, from first-millennium-AD Argentina, do not have size as a measure of scale, but rather that intensity of decoration offers a measure of scale, and continuous variations may occur. In her studies of miniature gold foil figures of Late Iron Age Scandinavia, Back Danielsson (2012Danielsson ( , 2013 has stressed that the very concept of miniature is delimiting as it reinforces representationalism, and denies the figures the possibility of being objects in their own right. Scale must thus be seen as something that cannot be taken for granted, but rather as something that has the potential of generating affect and relationships of varying intensities.…”
Section: Relational Corporeality and Affectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%