2024
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202304478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials Strategies to Overcome the Foreign Body Response

Xianchi Zhou,
Youxiang Wang,
Jian Ji
et al.

Abstract: The foreign body response (FBR) is an immune‐mediated reaction that can occur with most biomaterials and biomedical devices. The FBR initiates a deterioration in the performance of implantable devices, representing a longstanding challenge that has consistently hampered their optimal utilization. Over the last decade, significant strides have been achieved based on either hydrogel design or surface modifications to mitigate the FBR. This review delves into recent material strategies aimed at mitigating the FBR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 168 publications
(222 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Given that the FBR is primarily driven by inflammation, halting its progression is largely accomplished using antiinflammatory approaches which can involve optimizing both the physical and chemical properties of the material and/or utilizing drugs to reduce immune cell interaction at the tissue-implant interface and minimize the degree of fibrotic encapsulation. 2,3 While these methods effectively suppress fibrosis by antagonising the major pathways of inflammation, this also inactivates other beneficial aspects of immune signalling, such as those that drive tissue healing and associated processes like vascularization. 4 This poses a particular challenge for implants whose functions specifically rely not only on reduced fibrosis but also simultaneously require enhanced vascularisation, such as biosensors, insulin pumps, or cell encapsulation devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Given that the FBR is primarily driven by inflammation, halting its progression is largely accomplished using antiinflammatory approaches which can involve optimizing both the physical and chemical properties of the material and/or utilizing drugs to reduce immune cell interaction at the tissue-implant interface and minimize the degree of fibrotic encapsulation. 2,3 While these methods effectively suppress fibrosis by antagonising the major pathways of inflammation, this also inactivates other beneficial aspects of immune signalling, such as those that drive tissue healing and associated processes like vascularization. 4 This poses a particular challenge for implants whose functions specifically rely not only on reduced fibrosis but also simultaneously require enhanced vascularisation, such as biosensors, insulin pumps, or cell encapsulation devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%