1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02845207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal biosocial factors affecting low birth weight

Abstract: The causes of low birth weight (LBW) are multifactoral with genetic, placental, fetal and maternal factors interplaying with each other. To assess the influence of some of the maternal bio-social factors on the variance of birth weight, this study was undertaken. A total of 984 consecutive live births delivered at an urban hospital were analysed. The rate of LBW was 28.3% and preterms accounted for 3.2%. A strong correlation existed between birth weight and maternal height, weight, age, ANC visits and risk sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
13
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As would be expected, lack of antenatal care was strongly associated with each of the adverse birth outcomes we examined, but our data suggest that the lack of antenatal care is particularly important for preterm deliveries. The fact that unbooked mothers were more likely to deliver LBW but not high birthweight babies, is consistent with results of other studies from developing countries, 8,23 , 24 and suggests that nutrition remains a concern in this population. However of critical relevance for Maternal and Child Health programmes was the finding that the risk of stillbirth associated with prematurity was higher among unbooked than among booked mothers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As would be expected, lack of antenatal care was strongly associated with each of the adverse birth outcomes we examined, but our data suggest that the lack of antenatal care is particularly important for preterm deliveries. The fact that unbooked mothers were more likely to deliver LBW but not high birthweight babies, is consistent with results of other studies from developing countries, 8,23 , 24 and suggests that nutrition remains a concern in this population. However of critical relevance for Maternal and Child Health programmes was the finding that the risk of stillbirth associated with prematurity was higher among unbooked than among booked mothers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in accordance with the studies of Roth et al 5 A significant association between primiparity and VLBW was observed in this study. This was comparable with the previous studies of Amin et al, Mallik et al 6,7 The incidence of VLBW is high when birth interval is less than 2 years than compared to birth interval more than 2 years. This may be due to a minimum period of 2-3 years for the mother's nutrition and general condition to attain the pre-pregnancy level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(38.5%). 15 Amin et al found 61.7% mothers with height <150cm delivered LBW babies, which was statistically not significant. 14 In the present study, the percentage of low birth weight babies was higher in second para and above (18%) compared with primiparous mothers (14%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%