2022
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Body Mass Index, Diabetes, and Gestational Weight Gain and Risk for Pediatric Cancer in Offspring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background Pediatric cancer incidence has steadily increased concurrent with rising adult obesity, but associations between maternal obesity and associated comorbidities and pediatric cancer risk remain understudied. We aimed to quantitatively characterize associations of pediatric cancer risk with maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and maternal diabetes. Methods We performed a comprehensive and systematic l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2010, a meta-analysis performed by Alam et al suggested that higher maternal weight did not increase testicular cancer risk in offspring, which is inconsistent with our findings [ 24 ]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 34 studies published in 2022 found pregnancy BMI was positively associated with leukemia risk in offspring (odds ratio [OR] per 5-unit BMI increase = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04–1.1), which is consistent with our study [ 47 ]. In comparison, our meta-analysis not only included pediatric cancer but also cancer in adults, which is thought to be more comprehensive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In 2010, a meta-analysis performed by Alam et al suggested that higher maternal weight did not increase testicular cancer risk in offspring, which is inconsistent with our findings [ 24 ]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 34 studies published in 2022 found pregnancy BMI was positively associated with leukemia risk in offspring (odds ratio [OR] per 5-unit BMI increase = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04–1.1), which is consistent with our study [ 47 ]. In comparison, our meta-analysis not only included pediatric cancer but also cancer in adults, which is thought to be more comprehensive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, current results may differ from previous analyses due to folate being administered perigestationally versus directly to offspring. Although previous findings [30, 31] demonstrated associations between maternal folate and adverse events in offspring [31], and it is established that the maternal intrauterine environment can impact offspring cancer risk [4749], it is possible that maternal conditions are not as critical to plexiform-like neurofibroma formation relative to other tumors. Future studies on the effects dietary folate levels throughout life may reveal a role in peripheral nerve sheath tumor development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we were able to use the large GOBACK study, we still had insufficient sample size to thoroughly investigate EMM because the sample size within the strata of covariates became sparse. Our selection of covariates was primarily limited to demographic variables from the birth certificate, precluding investigation of health‐related factors such as maternal smoking, alcohol use, or diabetes, which have been shown to be associated with pediatric cancers 22,34,41,42 . As a general limitation of registry studies, children who moved from their state of birth would be lost to follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our selection of covariates was primarily limited to demographic variables from the birth certificate, precluding investigation of healthrelated factors such as maternal smoking, alcohol use, or diabetes, which have been shown to be associated with pediatric cancers. 22,34,41,42 As a general limitation of registry studies, children who moved from their state of birth would be lost to follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%