1996
DOI: 10.1093/icb/36.2.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Condition and Nest Site Choice: An Alternative for the Maintenance of Environmental Sex Determination?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
133
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
133
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conover 1984 temperature may differentially affect fitness in males and females via multiple, complex pathways (reviewed by Shine 1999), posing a substantial challenge to comprehensive empirical analysis. For example, TSD may enhance maternal fitness if (A) egg size (i.e., offspring size) has sex-specific fitness consequences (Roosenburg 1996); (B) incubation temperature influences phenotypes of offspring independent of sex, but the phenotypic determinants of fitness differ between males and females; (C) incubation temperature differentially modifies fitness-related phenotypes (and hence fitness) of male and female offspring (Shine et al 1995;Elphick and Shine 1999); or (D) incubation temperature influences the timing of hatching, allowing offspring sex to be matched with the optimal seasonal time for hatching (Conover 1984). Any attempt to test the Charnov-Bull approach thus necessarily must examine a wide range of variables.…”
Section: Rhen and Lang 1995mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conover 1984 temperature may differentially affect fitness in males and females via multiple, complex pathways (reviewed by Shine 1999), posing a substantial challenge to comprehensive empirical analysis. For example, TSD may enhance maternal fitness if (A) egg size (i.e., offspring size) has sex-specific fitness consequences (Roosenburg 1996); (B) incubation temperature influences phenotypes of offspring independent of sex, but the phenotypic determinants of fitness differ between males and females; (C) incubation temperature differentially modifies fitness-related phenotypes (and hence fitness) of male and female offspring (Shine et al 1995;Elphick and Shine 1999); or (D) incubation temperature influences the timing of hatching, allowing offspring sex to be matched with the optimal seasonal time for hatching (Conover 1984). Any attempt to test the Charnov-Bull approach thus necessarily must examine a wide range of variables.…”
Section: Rhen and Lang 1995mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in egg size can generate variation in offspring size and subsequent fitness (Sinervo et al 1992), and the relationship between offspring size and fitness may differ between the sexes (Roosenburg 1996). Thus, a female parent may benefit by producing offspring of the sex that benefits most from a given egg size (Roosenburg 1996; but see Morjan and Janzen 2003).…”
Section: Hypothesis A: Different Optimal Egg Sizes For Sons Versus Damentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas temperature effects on certain traits may be mediated by temperature-induced variation is sex steroid levels in some species, studies in snapping turtles indicate 96 T. Rhen and J. W. Lang McKnight and Gutzke 1993Bobyn and Brooks 1994Spotila et al 1994Roosenburg 1996Roosenburg and Kelley 1996Foley 1998Demuth 2001Janzen and Morjan 2002 that temperature can have effects mediated via alternative mechanisms. In experiments described earlier, snapping turtle embryos were treated with exogenous estrogen or a potent aromatase inhibitor at the beginning of the thermosensitive period (TSP).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Temperature Effects On Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purportedly, TSD persists adaptively in some systems where maternal effects on egg allocation prevent the evolution of GSD. Based on data from Malaclemys terrapin, Roosenburg (1996) proposed that females choose nesting sites according to the size of their eggs, because egg size is positively correlated with offspring size and translates into differential fitness for sons and daughters (sensu Charnov and Bull 1977). Female hatchlings are postulated to benefit more from a larger initial size through posthatching growth (thus related to the sexual size dimorphism hypothesis).…”
Section:       mentioning
confidence: 99%