2020
DOI: 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Consistency in Recalling Prenatal Experiences at 6 Months and 8 Years Postnatal

Abstract: Objective: Mothers are known to be reliable reporters of smoking during pregnancy, type of delivery, and birth weight when compared with medical records. Few studies have considered whether the timing of retrospective collection affects the mother's retrospective self-report. We examined the consistency of maternal retrospective recall of prenatal experiences, behaviors, and basic birth outcomes between 6 months and 8 years postpartum. Method: We examin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal history is notoriously unreliable in diagnosing prenatal drug exposure, especially in situations where there is no rapport with the clinicians [88] or if there are legal implications with drug-use disclosure [89]. Some women may have difficulties recalling precise drug use histories even if there is no risk of repercussions [90].…”
Section: Drug Screening and Testing To Diagnose Prenatal Ma Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maternal history is notoriously unreliable in diagnosing prenatal drug exposure, especially in situations where there is no rapport with the clinicians [88] or if there are legal implications with drug-use disclosure [89]. Some women may have difficulties recalling precise drug use histories even if there is no risk of repercussions [90].…”
Section: Drug Screening and Testing To Diagnose Prenatal Ma Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affirmative responses were summed. Recent evaluations of retrospective report of adverse events found moderate agreement between retrospective and prospective measures (Ramos et al, 2020;Reuben et al, 2016), supporting the validity of this measurement timing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, the current study also had several limitations. First, although recent evaluations suggest that retrospective report of exposure to significant life events (such as the experiences of severe illness, death of a close relative, or relationship changes) provides a valid measure of these exposures (Ramos et al, 2020), it is possible that postnatal experiences could impact the way participants remember events from their pregnancy. In the current study, we asked women about their experiences of these events during pregnancy at their child's age 6 assessment, whereas the measure of distress was measured during pregnancy.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, women retrospectively reported on pSLE when their children were ~8 years old. Although this approach is commonly used and recent evidence further supports validity of its use (especially for more significant and memorable life events) ( 75 , 76 , 113 ), there is still a potential for event recall bias. In addition, women's pIPV was assessed in the third trimester of pregnancy, wherein women reported their experiences over the past year, leaving the possibility that some pIPV was experienced in the few months prior to pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women responded yes or no to each item; all responses were summed into a total count of different types of pSLE experienced (range 0–14). Given the magnitude and significance of these stressful life events, such measures are thought to have limited recall bias and be accurate over a span of years ( 75 , 76 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%