“…First, the cross-sectional design of the study does not allow for establishing causal relationships. Also, the FFQ previously validated for adults (20) was not developed for pregnancy; however, epidemiological studies have shown that FFQ can be used to measure nutritional dietary intake during pregnancy with acceptable validity and reproducibility (7,10) , including in Brazil (37) . Finally, the 0·018 0·471 − 0·031, 0·067 0·035 0·169 − 0·014, 0·084 0·033 0·180 − 0·015, 0·080 Family income ($US) † 0·0003 0·007 0·0001, 0·0005 0·0001 0·259 − 0·0001, 0·0003 − 0·0003 0·025 − 0·0005, 0·0003 Parity (n) − 0·083 0·041 − 0·163, −0·003 − 0·015 0·715 − 0·095, 0·065 0·142 <0·001 0·065, 0·219 Marital status 0·023 0·688 − 0·090, 0·136 0·002 0·977 − 0·111, 0·115 0·125 0·026 0·015, 0·236 Skin colour 0·015 0·761 − 0·084, 0·114 − 0·026 0·600 − 0·125, 0·072 0·021 0·678 − 0·077, 0·118 Adjusted Age (years) 0·021 0·058 − 0·001, 0·042 − 0·017 0·075 − 0·037, 0·003 − 0·018 0·061 − 0·037, 0·001 Schooling (years) 0·019 0·406 − 0·026, 0·065 0·025 0·132 − 0·018, 0·067 0·010 0·628 − 0·030, 0·050 Family income ($US) † 0·0006 0·011 0·0001, 0·001 0·0004 0·090 − 0·0001, 0·001 − 0·0004 0·102 − 0·001, 0·0001 Parity (n) − 0·097 0·030 − 0·184, −0·009 0·007 0·861 − 0·074, 0·089 0·098 0·012 0·021, 0·175 Marital status ‡ 0·030 0·588 − 0·078, 0·137 0·0004 0·993 − 0·100, 0·101 0·073 0·131 −0·022, 0·168 *The models were adjusted for total energy intake and pre-gestational BMI.…”