2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2004.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal effects and cancer risk in the progeny of mice exposed to X-rays before conception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the result of numerous publications suggests that radiation may also have an indirect effect on genome stability that is transmitted through the germ line of irradiated parents to their offspring (Dubrova 2003, Dasenbrock et al 2005. Due to strong selection against several defects at the earliest stage of pregnancy, this genetic effect of radiation is likely to be difficult to detect in people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the result of numerous publications suggests that radiation may also have an indirect effect on genome stability that is transmitted through the germ line of irradiated parents to their offspring (Dubrova 2003, Dasenbrock et al 2005. Due to strong selection against several defects at the earliest stage of pregnancy, this genetic effect of radiation is likely to be difficult to detect in people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutational events may be an indirect effect on genome stability that is transmitted through the germ line of irradiated parents to their offspring (Dubrova 2003, Dasenbrock et al 2005. Teratogenic effects of various types of ionizing radiation at different stages of pregnancy, death, and morphological changes in embryos and fetus of experimental animals have been shown (Hall 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies of these transgeneration effects used various tests such as the specific locus, dominant lethal, and heritable translocation assays [Generoso et al, 1980;Russell and Kelly, 1982;Green et al, 1987;Russell et al, 1998]. Other studies focused on heritable alterations in cancer incidence and teratogenesis following the parental preconception irradiation [Mohr et al, 1999;Pils et al, 1999;Nomura, 2003;Nomura et al, 2004;Dasenbrock et al, 2005]. In addition to this classic evidence for transmitted effects, it is now apparent that risks to the progeny of irradiated parents also include transgeneration genomic instability [Carls and Schiestl, 1999;Mohr et al, 1999;Barber et al, 2002Shiraishi et al, 2002;Dubrova, 2003a,b;Morgan, 2003b;Niwa, 2003;Nomura, 2003;Nomura et al, 2004;Slovinska et al, 2004;Dasenbrock et al, 2005;Tawn, 2005;Singer et al, 2006].…”
Section: Transgeneration Radiation-induced Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence in humans is most derived from case reports and epidemiological studies of consequences to the progeny of paternal occupational exposure to chemicals, ionizing radiation and electromagnetic fields prior to conception (3,(45)(46)(47). Dasenbrock et al (43) indicated that maternal preconceptual X-ray exposure to radiation is associated with a moderately increased incidence of liver and lung tumors in male descendants in C57BL/6N mice. Thus the fact that genetic damage to parental germ cells can be transmitted to the offspring as an origin of carcinogenesis has been well documented, and this was confirmed in the present experiment.…”
Section: ------------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomatis et al (5) subsequently found in the BDV1 rat system that the incidence of nerve tumors was significantly elevated in the F 1 generation when mating occurred two weeks after treatment of 9-week-old male rats with 80 mg/kg of ethylnitrosourea. Dasenbrock et al (43) described that maternal preconceptual exposure in C57BL/6J mice to radiation is associated with a moderately increased incidence of liver and lung tumors in the male descendants. The incidence of total tumors in the F 1 offspring, however, was not different from the control value.…”
Section: ------------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%