2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2002.00131.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal effects and the population dynamics of insects on plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also growing evidence that some maternal effects are not simply the accidental transmission of environmental information from one generation to the next. Rather, type and function of maternal effects appear often to have been shaped by natural selection (Hunter 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also growing evidence that some maternal effects are not simply the accidental transmission of environmental information from one generation to the next. Rather, type and function of maternal effects appear often to have been shaped by natural selection (Hunter 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, plasticity in egg size is an adaptive trait in some insects. Although there is a genetic component to egg size, maternal effects may also exert an influence where, for example, females lay larger eggs when exposed to nutritionally challenging hosts, resulting in greater larval survival rates (Fox et al , 1997; Awmack & Leather, 2002; Hunter, 2002). In the present study, although variation in egg volume was observed, there appeared to be no differential allocation of resources in relation to seedling species, although this may have been influenced by the absence of the normal oviposition substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution effects on offspring are tied to the induction of enzymatic activity and molecular pathways, or hormones, mRNA and proteins deposited into the zygotes of the offspring (Fox et al, 1995;Mousseau & Fox, 1998;Hunter, 2002;Ruiz-Montoya & Nunez-Farfan, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%