“…Despite theory suggesting that extensive time away from the infant may undermine the employed mother's ability to get to know her infant well and thus to behave in a sensitive, development-facilitating manner when with the child (Brazelton, 1986 ;Sroufe, 1988 ;Vaughn et al, 1980), most research fails to confirm this hypothesis. In fact, much research on mother-child interaction reported subsequent to the emergence of the child-care debate does not detect any differences between employed and nonemployed mothers, or mothers working part-time or fulltime, or mothers of children spending much or little time in routine nonmaternal care arrangements (Braungart-Reiker et al, 1999 ;Burchinal, Bryant, Lee, & Ramey, 1992 ;Goldberg & Easterbrooks, 1988 ;Gottfried, Gottfried, & Bathurst, 1988 ;Stifter et al, 1993 ;Stuckey, McGhee, & Bell, 1982 ;Zaslow, Pedersen, Suwalsky, & Rabinovich, 1989). With the exception of Belsky's (1999) recent research showing more time in care across the first 3 years of life to be associated with more negative mother-child interaction during the second and third years of life, and Black's (1990) investigation linking less synchronised mother-child communication patterns during the toddler and preschool years with centre-based care initiated in the first year, the handful of other reports documenting negative effects of amount of care in infancy on mother-infant interaction studied dyads in the first half of the first year (Campbell, Cohn, & Meyers, 1995 ;Owen & Cox, 1988 ;Schirtzinger, Lutz, & Hock, 1993).…”