“…Although there is growing evidence that fathers can affect infant sex ratios (e.g., Edwards & Cameron, ; Lavoie, Tedeschi, García‐González, & Firman, ; Tanaka, Fukano, & Nakamura, ; reviewed in Douhard, ), variation in mammalian infant sex ratios has been found to be mostly linked to maternal physical condition, proxied by age (e.g., Martin & Festa‐Bianchet, ; Packer, Collins, & Eberly, ; Saltz, ), body mass (e.g., Borowik & Jędrzejewska, ), access to food resources (e.g., Schwanz & Robert, ), dominance rank (e.g., Schino, ; van Schaik & Hrdy, ), occurrence of lactation at the time of conception (e.g., Dias, Coyohua‐Fuentes, Canales‐Espinosa, & Rangel‐Negrín, ; Rutberg, ), rainfall (e.g., Kruuk, Clutton‐Brock, Albon, Pemberton, & Guinness, ; Law, Fike, & Lent, ), or sex of preceding offspring (e.g., Hogg, Hass, & Jenni, ). It is assumed that these factors affect maternal reproductive physiology, and thus, sex allocation, an assumption now supported by the observation of covariation between maternal glucose or hormonal concentrations and offspring sex (Cameron, Lemons, Bateman, & Bennett, ; Gutiérrez‐Adán, Granados, Pintado, & De la Fuente, ; Rangel‐Negrín, Coyohua‐Fuentes, Canales‐Espinosa, Chavira‐Ramírez, & Dias, ; Ryan et al, ). Ultimately, variation in infant sex ratios is expected when fitness returns vary between sexes and parents are able to couple offspring sex with investment potential and local conditions (Altmann & Altmann, ; Clark, ; Trivers & Willard, ; but see Booksmythe, Mautz, Davis, Nakagawa, & Jennions, ; Cockburn, Legge, & Double, ).…”