“…Of the 31 studies analyzed in the review, 17 (55%) ( 12 , 18 , 22 - 27 , 29 , 34 - 39 , 41 ) referred to the DCO phenomenon, and 14 (45%) ( 13 - 17 , 19 - 21 , 28 , 30 - 33 , 40 ) , to DCO. The studies were mostly carried out in countries in South America (n=12;38%) ( 13 - 15 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 28 , 30 - 33 , 40 ) and in Europe (n=9;29%) ( 16 , 18 , 22 , 29 , 35 - 38 , 42 ) , with emphasis on Brazilian publications (n=11; 35%) ( 13 - 15 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 28 , 30 - 32 , 40 ) , that were exclusively related to DCO. In publications related to ND, which aimed to identify its occurrence in an isolated way (n=3;21%) ( 15 , 21 , 33 ) or together with other diagnoses (n=i11.79%) ( 13 - 14 , 16 - 17 , 19 - 20 , 28 , 30 - 32 , 40 ) , the breadth in the prevalence estimates is highlighted, which ranged from 6.7% ( 13 - 14 ) to 100% ( 15 - 16 , 28 , 33 ) .…”