2022
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal hepatitis C prevalence and trends by county, US: 2016–2020

Abstract: Background Trends in the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among women delivering live births may differ in rural vs. urban areas of the United States, but estimation of trends based on observed counts may lead to unstable estimates in rural counties due to small numbers. Objectives The objective of the study was to use small area estimation methods to provide updated county‐level prevalence estimates and, for the first time, trends in maternal HCV infection among live births by county‐level rura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our nationally representative cohort, the overall prevalence of HCV-positive pregnancies in 2018 was 5.3 cases per 1000 pregnancies. The estimate was similar to that of a recent study using the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth from 2016 to 2020 . However, the earliest recommendation for universal HCV screening in pregnancy did not arrive until 2018, so our findings may have underestimated the true prevalence of HCV-positive pregnancies in the US during the study period .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our nationally representative cohort, the overall prevalence of HCV-positive pregnancies in 2018 was 5.3 cases per 1000 pregnancies. The estimate was similar to that of a recent study using the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth from 2016 to 2020 . However, the earliest recommendation for universal HCV screening in pregnancy did not arrive until 2018, so our findings may have underestimated the true prevalence of HCV-positive pregnancies in the US during the study period .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimate was similar to that of a recent study using the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth from 2016 to 2020. 21 However, the earliest recommendation for universal HCV screening in pregnancy did not arrive until 2018, so our findings may have underestimated the true prevalence of HCV-positive pregnancies in the US during the study period. 9,22 Our data source also could not differentiate between active HCV viremia vs mere HCV seropositivity, which remains long after the viremia resolves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 This is associated with the relative scarcity of clinicians, distance to health care facilities, and near-total absence of public transportation and is compounded by the lack of HIV-specific programs and resources. 17 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Fewer rural counties have any HIV-related services available (75% vs 91% of urban counties), and multiple studies 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 have noted similar rural-urban differences for direct services, rapid testing, prevention education, and preexposure prophylaxis availability. These limitations are particularly exacerbated among PWUD whose frequent stigmatization in health care environments limits their desire and ability to access routine and preventive care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%