2005
DOI: 10.1159/000084677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal, Neonatal and Collection Factors Influencing the Haematopoietic Content of Cord Blood Units

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) contains haematopoietic stem cells and can be used as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation in certain cases. Engraftment was dependent upon the haematopoietic progenitor cell content of the cord blood units. This study was designed to investigate the influence of obstetric, neonatal and collection factors on the volume and haematopoietic content of UCB donations. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of obstetric and neonatal factors was p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
61
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(24 reference statements)
13
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We read with interest the article by Aroviita and colleagues 1 reporting that the concentration of hematopoietic progenitor cells in cord blood (CB) was higher in male infants, even after adjustment for birth weight. Previously, by use of multivariate analysis, we 2 and others 3,4 did not observe an influence of sex on hematopoietic content of CB. In response to the observations of Aroviita and coworkers and recognizing the importance of infants’ weight on the volume and cell content of CB, 5 we reanalyzed pertinent data for our stored CB units.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cb Collections By Newborns’ Weight and Smentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We read with interest the article by Aroviita and colleagues 1 reporting that the concentration of hematopoietic progenitor cells in cord blood (CB) was higher in male infants, even after adjustment for birth weight. Previously, by use of multivariate analysis, we 2 and others 3,4 did not observe an influence of sex on hematopoietic content of CB. In response to the observations of Aroviita and coworkers and recognizing the importance of infants’ weight on the volume and cell content of CB, 5 we reanalyzed pertinent data for our stored CB units.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cb Collections By Newborns’ Weight and Smentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The HUC is an excellent and unique source of various types of cells (differentiated and nondifferentiated) that can be used for A close cooperation between obstetric services (cell harvesting and acquisition) and the biotechnical laboratory (cell processing and tissue engineering) is needed to set up standards in quantity and quality control, sterility purposes, and sampling techniques. In addition various factors such as influence of type of birth (vaginal vs caesarean), vaginal contamination (meconium, bacteria, and so on), influence of maternal infections, and certainly fetal factors (age, weight, infection, gender, sex, and so on) have to be closely evaluated (15,16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otro lado, se encontró, que de las variables neonatales, la longitud del cordón fue la única que se correlacionó con el recuento total de células nucleadas y no hubo ninguna otra correlación entre las demás variables maternas o neonatales analizadas como vía del parto, peso materno, edad gestacional, peso de placenta, peso del bebé datos que contrastan en cuanto a que el peso del neonato al momento del nacimiento es el principal factor neonatal que afecta el Numero de CD34+ y Recuento de células nucleadas (7)(8)(9)(10)22,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Llama la atención el hecho que se hubiera encontrado correlación solamente entre la longitud del cordón umbilical y el recuento total de células nucleadas y no también con el recuento de células CD34+, teniendo en cuenta, y según los resultados del presente estudio, la existencia de correlación entre estos dos marcadores de calidad, inquietudes que valen la pena tener en cuenta para próximas investigaciones.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified