1994
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170080043007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal-Newborn Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Harlem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are unaware of any studies comparing HIV risk factors for pregnant women with those of non-pregnant women. However, in the Harlem study 30 , the proportion of HIV-infected pregnant women who admitted ever using injected drugs was signi® cantly lower than that for women with reported AIDS from the same city (21% vs 61%). The higher proportion of IDUs among women with AIDS may merely represent the risk factor pro® le for women acquiring HIV infection earlier in the epidemic.…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We are unaware of any studies comparing HIV risk factors for pregnant women with those of non-pregnant women. However, in the Harlem study 30 , the proportion of HIV-infected pregnant women who admitted ever using injected drugs was signi® cantly lower than that for women with reported AIDS from the same city (21% vs 61%). The higher proportion of IDUs among women with AIDS may merely represent the risk factor pro® le for women acquiring HIV infection earlier in the epidemic.…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly, in San Francisco 36 , women with no prenatal care reported HIV risk factors more frequently and had a higher HIV seroprevalence than did prenatal clinic attendees (1.5% vs 0.7%). In western Palm Beach County 31 , the HIV seroprevalence was 14.3% 30 Black race 30,32± 35 Hispanic race 34,35 Geographic factors Residence in an urban area 33 Residence in the Northeast or Southern USA 33 Residence in New York, District of Columbia, New Jersey or Florida 34 Residence in the San Francisco Bay area 35 among women with no prenatal care compared with 5.1% among patients attending public prenatal clinics and 0.5% among private patients receiving prenatal care. In New York City, 5 of 10 HIVpositive women had received no prenatal care compared to only 14.9% of HIV-negative women 29 .…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, two studies found that racial differentials in HIV prevalence were much more prominent in urban areas of their states than in suburban or rural communities. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] There is conflicting evidence concerning His- "^ScJj ir1 00 panic women. Two studies in Los Angeles found low rates of HIV infection, whereas studies on the East Coast suggest higher seroprevalence.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 An innercity study found that newborns placed in foster care at the time of hospital discharge were 8 times more likely to have been born to HIV-infected women than were newborns discharged to the care of their mothers. 5 In addition to the increased risk of perinatally acquired HIV infection for those in foster care, children and adolescents in foster care may have been sexually abused, placing them at risk for acquisition of HIV infection. Adolescents who use drugs or are sexually active are also at risk for acquisition of HIV infection, and adolescent risky behavior may precede placement in foster care or may occur while in foster care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%