2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Obesity as a Risk Factor for the Development of Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection in Their Offspring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small case control study by Alvarado-Terrones et al. ( 22 ), investigating maternal factors associated with incidence of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) presented findings consistent with these observations. This study included 55 mother-child cases with isolated TAPVC and 152 healthy mother-child cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small case control study by Alvarado-Terrones et al. ( 22 ), investigating maternal factors associated with incidence of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) presented findings consistent with these observations. This study included 55 mother-child cases with isolated TAPVC and 152 healthy mother-child cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Maternal BMI was extracted from medical records and categorised into WHO obesity groups. In contrast with previously mentioned studied ( 22 , 24 , 26 ), Ghaderian et al. ( 25 ) report no statistically significant association between maternal obesity and infant CHD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Across the current analysis of CHDs and our previous analysis of maternal influenza vaccination and non‐CHDs using NBDPS data (Palmsten et al, 2022 ), only the adjusted CIs for simple TAPVR excluded the null. The biologic plausibility of this association is unclear (Alvarado‐Terrones et al, 2018 ). Based on the number of comparisons from our CHD and non‐CHD analyses (i.e., 29 overall), we expected one or two statistically significant associations due to chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the covariates during the adjustment for confounders; maternal age at birth, birth year, premature birth, medical history of epilepsy, diabetes, obesity, and the use of teratogenic drugs in the first trimester of pregnancy. These covariates were defined on the basis of previous papers ( Eriksson et al, 2000 ; Ive et al, 2013 ; Minakami et al, 2014 ; Alvarado-Terrones et al, 2018 ; Trefz et al, 2018 ; Mbizvo et al, 2020 ). These covariates were considered a cause of exposure, of outcome, or of both or a proxy for an unmeasured factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%