2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000255668.20639.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Outcomes Associated With Planned Primary Cesarean Births Compared With Planned Vaginal Births

Abstract: II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
165
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
165
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In addition, identification of subjects via unvalidated methods, for instance requiring only a single International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing code, and requiring it to be present around the time of the birth hospitalization may result in a bias toward patients with more active or severe MS in some studies. Consistent with this was the observation of an increased risk of cesarean deliveries, a known cause of longer birth hospitalizations, 19,20 in women with MS when MS was identified by ICD billing codes alone 4 -something not found in other studies with a more comprehensive case ascertainment. 7 One study examining hospital stays in newborns of mothers with MS 11 reported longer stays (relative risk 5 1.5; 95% CI: 0.99-2.3) compared with newborns of mothers without MS 11 ; however, the authors speculated this was attributable to the common practice of discharging mother and newborn home together, as no other adverse birth outcomes were observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 In addition, identification of subjects via unvalidated methods, for instance requiring only a single International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing code, and requiring it to be present around the time of the birth hospitalization may result in a bias toward patients with more active or severe MS in some studies. Consistent with this was the observation of an increased risk of cesarean deliveries, a known cause of longer birth hospitalizations, 19,20 in women with MS when MS was identified by ICD billing codes alone 4 -something not found in other studies with a more comprehensive case ascertainment. 7 One study examining hospital stays in newborns of mothers with MS 11 reported longer stays (relative risk 5 1.5; 95% CI: 0.99-2.3) compared with newborns of mothers without MS 11 ; however, the authors speculated this was attributable to the common practice of discharging mother and newborn home together, as no other adverse birth outcomes were observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In building the generalized estimating equations, a logarithmic transformation was applied to the length of birth hospitalization to account for the right-skewed data distribution. A priori potential confounders considered in the maternal hospitalization analysis included cesarean delivery, 19,20 maternal age, 19 maternal comorbidity 19 (hypertension or diabetes), number of antenatal visits, 19 obesity as measured by BMI, 21 parity, 19 and prolonged labor. 19 For newborns, the following a priori confounders were considered: 5-minute Apgar score, 19 birth weight, 19 congenital anomaly, 19 maternal age, 19 comorbidity 19 (hypertension or diabetes), and substance use exposure 19 (i.e., alcohol, cigarettes, or drugs of abuse).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several experts have noted a shift in norms towards higher use of technology at birth (McCourt et al, 2007;MacDonald, 2011). Cesarean section is generally safe, although not as safe as vaginal delivery unless indicated by complications (Declercq et al, 2007). A scheduled Cesarean section can be convenient for obstetricians, other hospital personnel, and the family, yet the cost is about 50 percent higher for Medicaid than for a vaginal birth (see Exhibit 3).…”
Section: Reducing Cesarean Section Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probability weights are calculated, adjusted for incomplete and missing data, and used to establish correct matches. The validity of the probabilistic record linkage is extremely high with less than 1% of records having an incorrect match [13][14][15][16] . The NSW Centre for Health Record Linkage conducted the record linkage and identifying information was removed prior to the release of data for analysis.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%