2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1085986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal smoking during pregnancy negatively affects brain volumes proportional to intracranial volume in adolescents born very preterm

Abstract: BackgroundMaternal smoking during pregnancy has been shown to associate with smaller frontal lobe and cerebellar volumes in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at term age in very preterm infants. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on volumetric brain MRI findings at 13 years. We hypothesized that adverse effects of smoking during pregnancy on brain volumes are still seen during adolescence.MethodsIncluded adolescents were born very preterm (gestational age … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanistically, prenatal smoke exposure may elicit adverse effects on children by altering offspring's epigenetic and genetic pro les such as DNA methylation and telomere length [28][29][30] , resulting in weak muscle tone and reduced cardiovascular and lung functions as well as impaired neurodevelopment such as smaller brain volume 2,[31][32][33][34][35] . The extent of alterations has been shown to be gender-dependent in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistically, prenatal smoke exposure may elicit adverse effects on children by altering offspring's epigenetic and genetic pro les such as DNA methylation and telomere length [28][29][30] , resulting in weak muscle tone and reduced cardiovascular and lung functions as well as impaired neurodevelopment such as smaller brain volume 2,[31][32][33][34][35] . The extent of alterations has been shown to be gender-dependent in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%