2005
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Structure and Autonomy Support in Conversations About the Past: Contributions to Children's Autobiographical Memory.

Abstract: The authors examined the contributions of maternal structure and autonomy support to children's collaborative and independent reminiscing. Fifty mother-child dyads discussed past experiences when the children were 40 and 65 months old. Children also discussed past events with an experimenter at each age. Maternal structure and autonomy support appeared as 2 distinct and separable components of mothers' reminiscing style and acted in an additive fashion to predict children's memory. Children whose mothers demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
142
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
142
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of results suggests that as children internalize an approach to storytelling, the information that they hear their parents provide in narratives serves as an important source of modeling. In other investigations mothers' elaborative questions have been the key predictor of children's level of recall for personal experiences (Cleveland & Reese, 2005;Farrant & Reese, 2000;Haden, 1998). There are at least three possible explanations for this difference found between our findings and others' finding regarding parent questions.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pattern of results suggests that as children internalize an approach to storytelling, the information that they hear their parents provide in narratives serves as an important source of modeling. In other investigations mothers' elaborative questions have been the key predictor of children's level of recall for personal experiences (Cleveland & Reese, 2005;Farrant & Reese, 2000;Haden, 1998). There are at least three possible explanations for this difference found between our findings and others' finding regarding parent questions.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Second, "questions" as they are used in the present research, and "elaborative questions" as they have been used by other researchers, are not necessarily interchangeable. For example, in Cleveland and Reese (2005) "elaborative questions" were "usually whquestions containing at least one new piece of information about the event" (p. 381). In their example "What animals did we see at the zoo?"…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well established that there are a variety of maternal narration styles (e.g., Cleveland & Reese, 2005;Reese, Haden, & Fivush, 1993), thus we anticipated considerable individual variability in what the mothers would say in their demonstration videos. To account for differences in narration we therefore also included three experimenter demonstration conditions which varied narration style as well as degree of familiarity.…”
Section: Imitation From Televisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They prompt the relational ordering of events, and foreground narrative coherence. Likewise, the categorisaton of parental responses to reported child autobiographical memories as 'autonomy supportive' if they 'continue or expand on a child's topic/agenda' (Cleveland & Reese, 2005), privileges logical-sequential causality as a priority of collective reminiscing that is considered to be effective. The questions and prompts used in these studies organise experience for the child, bringing some aspects into prominence, while concealing others, and thereby position the chronology of what happens as a chief frame for autobiographical memory.…”
Section: Ascs09: Proceedings Of the 9th Conference Of The Australasiamentioning
confidence: 99%