2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 2 in a patient with a DGUOK mutation associated with hepatocerebral mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous reports have shown that some variants change highly conserved amino acids [ 3 , 4 , 9 , 16 , 20 , 23 ], integrated data show that mutations are not confined to these conserved sites. Many variants occur outside of the conserved region [ 3 9 , 11 13 , 19 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous reports have shown that some variants change highly conserved amino acids [ 3 , 4 , 9 , 16 , 20 , 23 ], integrated data show that mutations are not confined to these conserved sites. Many variants occur outside of the conserved region [ 3 9 , 11 13 , 19 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniparental heterodisomy involves 2 different homologous chromosomes (inherited from both grandparents) from one parent being transmitted to the offspring, indicating a meiosis I error, while uniparental isodisomy involves 2 identical, replica copies of a single homologue of a chromosome, indicating either a meiosis II error or postzygotic chromosomal duplication [Shin et al, 2016]. The phenotypes characteristic of UPD are generally considered to be due to the presence of imprinted genes on the chromosomes involved, as UPD has been associated with trisomy mosaicism or homozygosity of autosomal recessively inherited mutations [Tohyama et al, 2011;Haudry et al, 2012;Hannula-Jouppi et al, 2014]. Imprinting effects likely cause the phenotypic abnormalities characteristic of the distinctive malformation complex observed in patUPD14 syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 There was no imprinting gene located on chromosome 2 and both maternal and paternal UPD2 have been reported in individuals with normal phenotypes. 3,4 Considering that there had been no abnormal features, except MDS, we speculated that the homozygous mutation of DGUOK caused by UPD2 was the cause of the disease in this patient. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the fifth reported case of complete paternal UPD of chromosome 2.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 94%