Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectiveTo compare maternal vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters at 35‐37 weeks’ gestation, in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and those with fetal growth restriction (FGR).MethodsThis was a prospective observational non‐intervention study in women with singleton pregnancies attending for a routine hospital visit at 35+0 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters obtained by a non‐invasive operator independent device, including pulse wave velocity, augmention index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and fetal heart rate. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded and the values in the SGA and FGR groups were compared between them and with unaffected pregnancies. Diagnosis of SGA was based on the birth of a baby with birthweight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. In FGR, in addition to a birthweight below the 10th percentile, at the 35‐37 weeks scan Doppler studies had shown that the uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was above the 95th percentile for gestational age or the fetal middle cerebral artery PI was below the 5th percentile.ResultsIn the 6,413 women included in the study there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) of FGR and 5,675 (88.5%) unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also increased, whereas aortic stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR, compared to the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas, heart rate was lower.ConclusionsIn SGA and FGR pregnancies there are deranged maternal hemodynamic responses when these are compared to normal pregnancies. Mothers with FGR babies have higher central blood pressure compared to SGA ones, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
ObjectiveTo compare maternal vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters at 35‐37 weeks’ gestation, in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and those with fetal growth restriction (FGR).MethodsThis was a prospective observational non‐intervention study in women with singleton pregnancies attending for a routine hospital visit at 35+0 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters obtained by a non‐invasive operator independent device, including pulse wave velocity, augmention index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and fetal heart rate. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded and the values in the SGA and FGR groups were compared between them and with unaffected pregnancies. Diagnosis of SGA was based on the birth of a baby with birthweight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. In FGR, in addition to a birthweight below the 10th percentile, at the 35‐37 weeks scan Doppler studies had shown that the uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was above the 95th percentile for gestational age or the fetal middle cerebral artery PI was below the 5th percentile.ResultsIn the 6,413 women included in the study there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) of FGR and 5,675 (88.5%) unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also increased, whereas aortic stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR, compared to the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas, heart rate was lower.ConclusionsIn SGA and FGR pregnancies there are deranged maternal hemodynamic responses when these are compared to normal pregnancies. Mothers with FGR babies have higher central blood pressure compared to SGA ones, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Translating vascular aging research from bench to bedside presents both significant opportunities and challenges. This paper summarizes insights from a roundtable discussion at the Artery 23 conference, featuring perspectives from basic science, clinical trials, regulation, and industry. The main conclusions of the discussion are as follows: basic science research must align with clinical relevance, using appropriate animal models and standardized measurement techniques. Pragmatic and registry-based clinical trials offer viable alternatives to traditional randomized controlled trials, facilitating real-world applicability. The regulatory landscape, particularly for software medical devices, must evolve to keep pace with technological advancements like artificial intelligence. Industry efforts focus on developing devices or solutions for vascular aging assessment and treatment strategies, yet face hurdles in large-scale adoption and reimbursement. Despite significant progress, the development of pharmacological interventions to mitigate vascular aging remains a critical need. This discussion underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to overcome barriers and translate scientific discoveries into clinical practice effectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.