Objective: To investigate the relationships between self-assessed ®nancial dif®culties, diet in pregnancy and birthweight. Design: Information on diet composition, dif®culty in affording food, smoking habits and parity was collected by self-completion questionnaires at 32 weeks of pregnancy. Information on birthweights was obtained from hospital records. Subjects: A geographically de®ned population 11 833 pregnant women resident in the South-West of England. Main outcome measures: Nutrient intakes, food choices and birthweight. Results: Women with greater dif®culty in affording food had lower intakes of protein, ®bre, vitamin C, niacin, pyridoxine, iron, zinc, magnesium and potassium than did women with little or no dif®culty. They were more likely to use cooking and spreading fats with a high saturates content, and less likely to eat ®sh, fruit, vegetables and salad. In a multivariate analysis including parity and smoking status, ®nancial dif®culty was found to have no signi®cant relationship with birthweight. Conclusion: The quality of diet in pregnancy falls with increasing dif®culty in affording food. However, this does not appear to affect mean birthweight of infants born after 32 weeks gestation. Sponsor: The nutritional aspects of the study have been supported by Northern and Yorkshire regionÐNHS executive, Cow and Gate Ltd, the Meat & Livestock Commission and Coca-Cola UK. Descriptors: pregnancy; diet; nutrient intake; food choices; ®nancial dif®culties; smoking; birthweight
IntroductionIn a 1995 report published by the National Children's Home and the Maternity Alliance (Dallison & Lobstein, 1995) the average weekly cost of an adequate diet for a pregnant woman was estimated at £18.12, almost half the income of a woman under 25 receiving bene®ts. However, in their survey of low-income pregnant women attending National Children's Home family centres 41% managed to spend less than £10 a week on food per family member, with many women regularly missing meals to save money. It has been suggested that the high incidence of lower than average birthweight among infants of these women might be partly attributable to a poor quality of diet during pregnancy.A number of studies have suggested that both the quantity and the quality of the diet in pregnancy may have an effect on birthweight (Rush, 1982;Olsen et al, 1986;Simmer et al, 1987;Doyle et al, 1990;Olsen et al, 1990). Low birthweight has a number of consequences, including an increased incidence of neonatal morbidity (Walther & Ramaekers, 1982) and mortality (Bakketeig et al, 1984). Furthermore, recent work from Professor Barker and his group has suggested that poor diet in pregnancy, as a result of poverty, may cause both low birthweight and metabolic programming in the fetus which is associated with an increased risk of a number of disorders such as cardiovascular disease (Barker & Fall, 1993;Barker et al, 1993b) and diabetes (Barker et al, 1993a) in adult life. Thus, if poor diets in pregnancy are adversely affecting birthweight at present this could repr...